ZPRA.DE vs. IBC6.DE
ZPRA.DE (SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)) and IBC6.DE (iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - ZPRA.DE tracks the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats while IBC6.DE tracks the MSCI Australia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZPRA.DE returned 6.59%/yr vs 8.07%/yr for IBC6.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZPRA.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IBC6.DE.
Performance
ZPRA.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPRA.DE achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than IBC6.DE's 10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPRA.DE has underperformed IBC6.DE with an annualized return of 6.59%, while IBC6.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.07% annualized return.
ZPRA.DE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 10.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 6.59%
IBC6.DE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 12.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
ZPRA.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPRA.DE SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) | 4.42% | 9.80% | 11.25% | 11.54% | -10.70% | 12.81% | -9.50% | 24.48% | -4.62% | 13.94% |
IBC6.DE iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 10.86% | 1.01% | 8.47% | 10.05% | -0.95% | 18.21% | -1.41% | 25.74% | -7.69% | 5.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPRA.DE and IBC6.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.68 |
The correlation between ZPRA.DE and IBC6.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPRA.DE vs. IBC6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ZPRA.DE
IBC6.DE
ZPRA.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (ZPRA.DE) and iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPRA.DE | IBC6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.16 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 1.61 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 4.12 | +0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPRA.DE | IBC6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 0.89 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.38 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.42 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.32 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
ZPRA.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPRA.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.54%, smaller than the maximum IBC6.DE drawdown of -43.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRA.DE and IBC6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPRA.DE | IBC6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.54% | -43.64% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.57% | -7.49% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.55% | -23.12% | +9.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.66% | -23.12% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.54% | -43.64% | +12.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -2.69% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.47% | -7.84% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.92% | -0.79% |
Volatility
ZPRA.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (ZPRA.DE) is 2.71%, while iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that ZPRA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBC6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPRA.DE | IBC6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 3.71% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.42% | 10.68% | -3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.67% | 13.47% | -3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 16.70% | -3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 19.31% | -4.84% |
ZPRA.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPRA.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IBC6.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZPRA.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Dividend Comparison
ZPRA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, while IBC6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC6.DE iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZPRA.DE SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.98% | 2.92% | 3.64% | 4.00% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.41% | 1.78% | 2.25% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPRA.DE and IBC6.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBC6.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBC6.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ZPRA.DE.
ZPRA.DE tracks S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats, while IBC6.DE tracks MSCI Australia. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ZPRA.DE and 0.50% for IBC6.DE.
Find the right allocation for ZPRA.DE and IBC6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer