PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPH.TO vs. SMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPH.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO) and Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPH.TO achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than SMAX.TO's 16.31% return.


ZPH.TO

1D
0.29%
1M
1.47%
6M
3.15%
YTD
2.64%
1Y
8.71%
3Y*
7.98%
5Y*
5.84%
10Y*

SMAX.TO

1D
-0.88%
1M
-0.23%
6M
13.97%
YTD
16.31%
1Y
31.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPH.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZPH.TO
BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF
2.64%9.47%4.21%9.17%
SMAX.TO
Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
16.31%13.56%34.57%6.14%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPH.TO and SMAX.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023

0.51

The correlation between ZPH.TO and SMAX.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZPH.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZPH.TO
SMAX.TO

Technology

42.2%
38.4%

Financial Services

17.2%
10.5%

Healthcare

17.1%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
3.3%

Industrials

6.8%
7.8%

Communication Services

5.7%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
8.3%

Basic Materials

-

3.5%

Energy

-

3.1%

Real Estate

-

3.7%

Utilities

-

3.3%

Technology

ZPH.TO
42.2%
SMAX.TO
38.4%

Financial Services

ZPH.TO
17.2%
SMAX.TO
10.5%

Healthcare

ZPH.TO
17.1%
SMAX.TO
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

ZPH.TO
8.3%
SMAX.TO
3.3%

Industrials

ZPH.TO
6.8%
SMAX.TO
7.8%

Communication Services

ZPH.TO
5.7%
SMAX.TO
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ZPH.TO
2.7%
SMAX.TO
8.3%

Basic Materials

ZPH.TO

-

SMAX.TO
3.5%

Energy

ZPH.TO

-

SMAX.TO
3.1%

Real Estate

ZPH.TO

-

SMAX.TO
3.7%

Utilities

ZPH.TO

-

SMAX.TO
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPH.TO vs. SMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPH.TO
ZPH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ZPH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SMAX.TO
SMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPH.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO) and Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZPH.TOSMAX.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.46

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

4.36

-2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.44

14.77

-9.33

ZPH.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the SMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPH.TO and SMAX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPH.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPH.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.38%, which is greater than SMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPH.TO and SMAX.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPH.TOSMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.38%

-18.88%

-14.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.07%

-7.33%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.30%

+2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-2.40%

-1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

2.16%

-0.56%

Volatility

ZPH.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO) is 2.42%, while Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that ZPH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPH.TOSMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

3.65%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.64%

10.70%

-5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.55%

13.09%

-6.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.18%

14.60%

-3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.59%

14.60%

-2.01%

ZPH.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZPH.TO and SMAX.TO have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

ZPH.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZPH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.32%, more than SMAX.TO's 9.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMAX.TO
Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
9.91%10.50%10.11%1.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZPH.TO
BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF
10.32%10.06%9.95%8.18%8.83%7.27%7.67%7.26%6.98%5.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPH.TO and SMAX.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPH.TO and SMAX.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Hamilton Capital.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPH.TO and SMAX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer