PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPDW.DE vs. 36B4.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPDW.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (ZPDW.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPDW.DE achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than 36B4.DE's 8.61% return.


ZPDW.DE

1D
-2.48%
1M
-4.34%
6M
9.40%
YTD
16.76%
1Y
43.91%
3Y*
25.04%
5Y*
19.19%
10Y*
14.04%

36B4.DE

1D
-0.79%
1M
2.83%
6M
4.52%
YTD
8.61%
1Y
19.17%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPDW.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ZPDW.DE
State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF
16.76%27.50%22.78%33.59%-5.96%12.63%7.91%7.63%
36B4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist
8.61%6.64%9.02%9.56%-13.77%9.87%6.38%16.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPDW.DE and 36B4.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019

0.79

The correlation between ZPDW.DE and 36B4.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPDW.DE vs. 36B4.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPDW.DE
ZPDW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ZPDW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

36B4.DE
36B4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
36B4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPDW.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (ZPDW.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZPDW.DE36B4.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.19

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

1.76

+2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.78

5.09

+9.69

ZPDW.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPDW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the 36B4.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPDW.DE and 36B4.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPDW.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPDW.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, which is greater than 36B4.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDW.DE and 36B4.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPDW.DE36B4.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-26.98%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-10.82%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.70%

-15.67%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.70%

-21.57%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.47%

-2.03%

-4.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.46%

-7.09%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.75%

-0.79%

Volatility

ZPDW.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (ZPDW.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE) at 4.74%. This indicates that ZPDW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 36B4.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPDW.DE36B4.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

4.74%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.62%

14.24%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.76%

18.44%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.83%

16.33%

+2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

17.25%

+1.20%

ZPDW.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPDW.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than 36B4.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZPDW.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Dividend Comparison

ZPDW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 36B4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
36B4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.48%1.46%1.38%1.81%2.45%1.54%1.60%0.81%
ZPDW.DE
State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPDW.DE and 36B4.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPDW.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDW.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for 36B4.DE.

ZPDW.DE tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to EUR Index, while 36B4.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ZPDW.DE and 0.20% for 36B4.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPDW.DE and 36B4.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer