ZPDS.DE vs. WELJ.DE
ZPDS.DE (SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF) and WELJ.DE (Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - ZPDS.DE tracks the S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector while WELJ.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Discretionary. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZPDS.DE returned 4.36%/yr vs 9.08%/yr for WELJ.DE. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZPDS.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WELJ.DE.
Performance
ZPDS.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPDS.DE achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than WELJ.DE's -1.85% return.
ZPDS.DE
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- 7.50%
- 6M
- 7.22%
- 1Y
- 0.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.36%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.84%
WELJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- -1.85%
- 6M
- -1.53%
- 1Y
- 6.43%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZPDS.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPDS.DE SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF | 7.50% | -8.90% | 20.38% | -5.08% | 1.59% |
WELJ.DE Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc | -1.85% | -4.79% | 29.73% | 30.43% | -8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPDS.DE and WELJ.DE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022 | 0.17 |
The correlation between ZPDS.DE and WELJ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPDS.DE vs. WELJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ZPDS.DE
WELJ.DE
ZPDS.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPDS.DE | WELJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.08 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | 0.44 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.10 | 1.20 | -1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPDS.DE | WELJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | 0.38 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.59 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
ZPDS.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPDS.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.29%, smaller than the maximum WELJ.DE drawdown of -28.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDS.DE and WELJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPDS.DE | WELJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.29% | -28.28% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -14.62% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.44% | -28.28% | +12.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.67% | -10.41% | +2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | -6.81% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.27% | 5.36% | -1.09% |
Volatility
ZPDS.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELJ.DE) at 5.07%. This indicates that ZPDS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPDS.DE | WELJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 5.07% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 12.51% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.02% | 16.84% | -2.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 18.18% | -4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 18.18% | -4.20% |
ZPDS.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPDS.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WELJ.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZPDS.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZPDS.DE nor WELJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPDS.DE and WELJ.DE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZPDS.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPDS.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WELJ.DE.
ZPDS.DE tracks S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector, while WELJ.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Discretionary. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZPDS.DE and 0.18% for WELJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for ZPDS.DE and WELJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer