ZPDF.DE vs. LBNK.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDF.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE).
ZPDF.DE and LBNK.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZPDF.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Financials Select Sector. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. LBNK.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Europe 600 Banks. It was launched on Aug 25, 2006. Both ZPDF.DE and LBNK.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ZPDF.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZPDF.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPDF.DE SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF | -8.52% | 3.01% | 37.12% | 8.46% | -6.12% | 48.31% | -12.18% | 35.27% | -10.30% | 7.53% |
LBNK.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc | -3.17% | 76.66% | 32.67% | 26.48% | 1.30% | 37.71% | -24.17% | 14.90% | -25.93% | 11.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPDF.DE achieves a -8.52% return, which is significantly lower than LBNK.DE's -3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPDF.DE has underperformed LBNK.DE with an annualized return of 11.96%, while LBNK.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.59% annualized return.
ZPDF.DE
- 1D
- -13.21%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -8.52%
- 6M
- -5.01%
- 1Y
- -5.88%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.96%
LBNK.DE
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 36.34%
- 3Y*
- 39.53%
- 5Y*
- 27.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZPDF.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPDF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LBNK.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZPDF.DE vs. LBNK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ZPDF.DE
LBNK.DE
ZPDF.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDF.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPDF.DE | LBNK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | 1.46 | -1.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | 1.91 | -2.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.27 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 2.81 | -2.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 10.32 | -10.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPDF.DE | LBNK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 | 1.46 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 1.19 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.04 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPDF.DE and LBNK.DE is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ZPDF.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZPDF.DE nor LBNK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ZPDF.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPDF.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, smaller than the maximum LBNK.DE drawdown of -81.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDF.DE and LBNK.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPDF.DE | LBNK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.38% | -81.84% | +39.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -15.83% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.67% | -27.82% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.38% | -56.08% | +13.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.52% | -10.53% | -2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -53.66% | +45.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 4.32% | +0.41% |
Volatility
ZPDF.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDF.DE) has a higher volatility of 21.85% compared to Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) at 9.23%. This indicates that ZPDF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBNK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZPDF.DE | LBNK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.85% | 9.23% | +12.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.60% | 16.42% | +7.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.82% | 24.71% | +4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.58% | 22.66% | -2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 25.45% | -3.02% |