ZPDE.DE vs. CSPX.L
ZPDE.DE (SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF) and CSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ZPDE.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Energy Select Sector, while CSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZPDE.DE returned 9.33%/yr vs 14.96%/yr for CSPX.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZPDE.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSPX.L.
Performance
ZPDE.DE vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZPDE.DE is traded in EUR, while CSPX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSPX.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPDE.DE achieves a 32.72% return, which is significantly higher than CSPX.L's 11.58% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPDE.DE has underperformed CSPX.L with an annualized return of 9.33%, while CSPX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.96% annualized return.
ZPDE.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 32.72%
- 6M
- 29.61%
- 1Y
- 43.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.16%
- 5Y*
- 21.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
CSPX.L
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 25.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 14.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.96%
ZPDE.DE vs. CSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPDE.DE SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 32.72% | -2.67% | 9.39% | -2.97% | 71.20% | 66.70% | -38.96% | 13.17% | -14.79% | -13.20% |
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.58% | 3.52% | 33.52% | 22.94% | -13.69% | 39.03% | 7.93% | 33.50% | -1.02% | 6.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPDE.DE and CSPX.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015 | 0.45 |
The correlation between ZPDE.DE and CSPX.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPDE.DE vs. CSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
ZPDE.DE
CSPX.L
ZPDE.DE vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDE.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPDE.DE | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.38 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 3.56 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 12.33 | -4.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPDE.DE | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.02 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.92 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.90 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.92 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
ZPDE.DE vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPDE.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, which is greater than CSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDE.DE and CSPX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPDE.DE | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.58% | -33.40% | -32.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.16% | -7.09% | -10.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.97% | -22.56% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.97% | -22.56% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.58% | -33.40% | -32.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -0.39% | -8.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.28% | -4.12% | -13.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.40% | 2.06% | +3.34% |
Volatility
ZPDE.DE vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDE.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 3.06%. This indicates that ZPDE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPDE.DE | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.53% | 3.06% | +4.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.35% | 8.74% | +11.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.96% | 12.53% | +11.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 15.93% | +10.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.89% | 16.61% | +12.28% |
ZPDE.DE vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPDE.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZPDE.DE vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZPDE.DE nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPDE.DE and CSPX.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSPX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ZPDE.DE.
ZPDE.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while CSPX.L is S&P 500. ZPDE.DE tracks S&P Energy Select Sector, while CSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZPDE.DE and 0.07% for CSPX.L.
Find the right allocation for ZPDE.DE and CSPX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer