PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPDD.DE vs. ZPDS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPDD.DE vs. ZPDS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDD.DE) and SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPDD.DE achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than ZPDS.DE's 7.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPDD.DE has outperformed ZPDS.DE with an annualized return of 13.15%, while ZPDS.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.84% annualized return.


ZPDD.DE

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
0.34%
6M
1.40%
1Y
11.32%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
13.15%

ZPDS.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
7.50%
6M
7.22%
1Y
0.43%
3Y*
4.36%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
6.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPDD.DE vs. ZPDS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZPDD.DE
SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF
0.34%-3.35%36.72%36.96%-30.97%39.97%15.91%32.48%4.88%7.37%
ZPDS.DE
SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF
7.50%-8.90%20.38%-5.08%5.38%26.65%-0.79%29.96%-4.12%-1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPDD.DE and ZPDS.DE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between ZPDD.DE and ZPDS.DE has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPDD.DE vs. ZPDS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPDD.DE
ZPDD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ZPDD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDS.DE
ZPDS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ZPDS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPDD.DE vs. ZPDS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDD.DE) and SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZPDD.DEZPDS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.02

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

0.05

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.25

0.10

+2.15

ZPDD.DE vs. ZPDS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPDD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the ZPDS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPDD.DE and ZPDS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZPDD.DEZPDS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.03

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.50

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.49

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.48

+0.09

Drawdowns

ZPDD.DE vs. ZPDS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPDD.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, which is greater than ZPDS.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDD.DE and ZPDS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPDD.DEZPDS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.03%

-23.29%

-13.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.91%

-8.74%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.56%

-15.44%

-14.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.02%

-16.54%

-17.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.03%

-23.29%

-13.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.19%

-7.67%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-6.14%

-2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

4.27%

+0.76%

Volatility

ZPDD.DE vs. ZPDS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDD.DE) is 5.49%, while SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that ZPDD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPDS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPDD.DEZPDS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

6.04%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.47%

11.46%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.17%

14.02%

+4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

13.37%

+8.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

13.98%

+6.57%

ZPDD.DE vs. ZPDS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZPDD.DE and ZPDS.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZPDD.DE vs. ZPDS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZPDD.DE nor ZPDS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPDD.DE and ZPDS.DE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDD.DE and ZPDS.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

ZPDD.DE tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector, while ZPDS.DE tracks S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPDD.DE and ZPDS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer