ZPDD.DE vs. WELJ.DE
ZPDD.DE (SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF) and WELJ.DE (Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - ZPDD.DE tracks the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector while WELJ.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Discretionary. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZPDD.DE returned 13.95%/yr vs 9.08%/yr for WELJ.DE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZPDD.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WELJ.DE.
Performance
ZPDD.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPDD.DE achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly higher than WELJ.DE's -1.85% return.
ZPDD.DE
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 11.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
WELJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- -1.85%
- 6M
- -1.53%
- 1Y
- 6.43%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZPDD.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPDD.DE SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF | 0.34% | -3.35% | 36.72% | 36.96% | -15.38% |
WELJ.DE Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc | -1.85% | -4.79% | 29.73% | 30.43% | -8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPDD.DE and WELJ.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022 | 0.94 |
The correlation between ZPDD.DE and WELJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPDD.DE vs. WELJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ZPDD.DE
WELJ.DE
ZPDD.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDD.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPDD.DE | WELJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.08 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 0.44 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.25 | 1.20 | +1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPDD.DE | WELJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.38 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.59 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
ZPDD.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPDD.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, which is greater than WELJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDD.DE and WELJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPDD.DE | WELJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -28.28% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.91% | -14.62% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | -28.28% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.19% | -10.41% | +3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -6.81% | -1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.03% | 5.36% | -0.33% |
Volatility
ZPDD.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELJ.DE) at 5.07%. This indicates that ZPDD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPDD.DE | WELJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 5.07% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 12.51% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.17% | 16.84% | +1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 18.18% | +3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 18.18% | +2.37% |
ZPDD.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPDD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WELJ.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZPDD.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZPDD.DE nor WELJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, ZPDD.DE and WELJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ZPDD.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPDD.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WELJ.DE.
ZPDD.DE tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector, while WELJ.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Discretionary. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZPDD.DE and 0.18% for WELJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for ZPDD.DE and WELJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer