PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPDD.DE vs. XZEC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPDD.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XZEC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPDD.DE achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than XZEC.DE's 3.52% return.


ZPDD.DE

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
0.34%
6M
1.40%
1Y
11.32%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
13.15%

XZEC.DE

1D
1.36%
1M
3.79%
YTD
3.52%
6M
4.05%
1Y
11.05%
3Y*
2.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPDD.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ZPDD.DE
SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF
0.34%-3.35%36.72%36.96%-30.97%18.11%
XZEC.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF
3.52%1.95%3.52%16.28%-16.49%0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPDD.DE and XZEC.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021

0.59

The correlation between ZPDD.DE and XZEC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPDD.DE vs. XZEC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPDD.DE
ZPDD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ZPDD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

XZEC.DE
XZEC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XZEC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZEC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZEC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XZEC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZEC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPDD.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XZEC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZPDD.DEXZEC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.13

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

0.98

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.25

2.63

-0.38

ZPDD.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPDD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the XZEC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPDD.DE and XZEC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZPDD.DEXZEC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.73

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.06

+0.51

Drawdowns

ZPDD.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPDD.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, which is greater than XZEC.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDD.DE and XZEC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPDD.DEXZEC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.03%

-30.22%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.91%

-11.27%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.56%

-23.79%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.19%

-4.58%

-2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-10.22%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

4.19%

+0.84%

Volatility

ZPDD.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XZEC.DE) at 4.04%. This indicates that ZPDD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XZEC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPDD.DEXZEC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

4.04%

+1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.47%

11.07%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.17%

15.07%

+3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

20.02%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

20.02%

+0.53%

ZPDD.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPDD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XZEC.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZPDD.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZPDD.DE nor XZEC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPDD.DE and XZEC.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPDD.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDD.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for XZEC.DE.

ZPDD.DE tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector, while XZEC.DE tracks MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened 20-35 Select. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZPDD.DE and 0.17% for XZEC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPDD.DE and XZEC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer