ZPDD.DE vs. WELW.DE
ZPDD.DE (SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF) and WELW.DE (Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - ZPDD.DE tracks the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector while WELW.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Staples. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZPDD.DE returned 13.95%/yr vs -0.01%/yr for WELW.DE. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZPDD.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WELW.DE.
Performance
ZPDD.DE vs. WELW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPDD.DE achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than WELW.DE's 3.14% return.
ZPDD.DE
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 11.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
WELW.DE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- -3.09%
- 3Y*
- -0.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZPDD.DE vs. WELW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPDD.DE SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF | 0.34% | -3.35% | 36.72% | 36.96% | -15.38% |
WELW.DE Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 3.14% | -7.11% | 9.48% | -1.99% | 5.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPDD.DE and WELW.DE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022 | 0.20 |
The correlation between ZPDD.DE and WELW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPDD.DE vs. WELW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ZPDD.DE
WELW.DE
ZPDD.DE vs. WELW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDD.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPDD.DE | WELW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.97 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | -0.34 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.25 | -0.62 | +2.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPDD.DE | WELW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | -0.24 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.19 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
ZPDD.DE vs. WELW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPDD.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, which is greater than WELW.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDD.DE and WELW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPDD.DE | WELW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -13.88% | -23.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.91% | -9.17% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | -13.88% | -15.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.19% | -8.99% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -5.45% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.03% | 4.96% | +0.07% |
Volatility
ZPDD.DE vs. WELW.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Amundi S&P Global Consumer Staples ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELW.DE) at 4.91%. This indicates that ZPDD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPDD.DE | WELW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 4.91% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 10.31% | +3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.17% | 12.66% | +5.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 11.48% | +10.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 11.48% | +9.07% |
ZPDD.DE vs. WELW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPDD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WELW.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZPDD.DE vs. WELW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZPDD.DE nor WELW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPDD.DE and WELW.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZPDD.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPDD.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WELW.DE.
ZPDD.DE tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector, while WELW.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZPDD.DE and 0.18% for WELW.DE.
Find the right allocation for ZPDD.DE and WELW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer