PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPA5.DE vs. CBUM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPA5.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (ZPA5.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CBUM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPA5.DE achieves a 10.20% return, which is significantly higher than CBUM.DE's 6.79% return.


ZPA5.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
2.18%
6M
9.16%
YTD
10.20%
1Y
19.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBUM.DE

1D
-1.48%
1M
-1.70%
6M
6.13%
YTD
6.79%
1Y
18.98%
3Y*
16.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPA5.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZPA5.DE
Amundi S&P 500 Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
10.20%2.76%34.10%4.52%
CBUM.DE
iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
6.79%15.88%21.99%4.75%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPA5.DE and CBUM.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2023

0.78

The correlation between ZPA5.DE and CBUM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPA5.DE vs. CBUM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPA5.DE
ZPA5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
ZPA5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPA5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPA5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPA5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPA5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUM.DE
CBUM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CBUM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPA5.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (ZPA5.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CBUM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZPA5.DECBUM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

2.10

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.72

8.78

-7.06

ZPA5.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPA5.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the CBUM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPA5.DE and CBUM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPA5.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPA5.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.13%, which is greater than CBUM.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPA5.DE and CBUM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPA5.DECBUM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.13%

-19.25%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.40%

-8.99%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.71%

-2.37%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

-3.56%

-2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.30%

2.16%

+9.14%

Volatility

ZPA5.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi S&P 500 Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (ZPA5.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CBUM.DE) have volatilities of 2.87% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPA5.DECBUM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

2.99%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

9.37%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.46%

12.09%

+12.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

14.98%

+4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.71%

14.98%

+4.73%

ZPA5.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPA5.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUM.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZPA5.DE vs. CBUM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZPA5.DE nor CBUM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPA5.DE and CBUM.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPA5.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPA5.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CBUM.DE.

ZPA5.DE is categorized as ESG, while CBUM.DE is S&P 500. ZPA5.DE tracks S&P 500 Net Zero 2050 Paris-Aligned ESG+ Index, while CBUM.DE tracks S&P 500 Scored & Screened Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZPA5.DE and 0.10% for CBUM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPA5.DE and CBUM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer