CBUM.DE vs. SPQB.DE
CBUM.DE (iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and SPQB.DE (Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - CBUM.DE tracks the S&P 500 Scored & Screened Index (EUR Hedged) while SPQB.DE tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% WHT Quarterly 5% Buffer Protect. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUM.DE returned 17.72%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for SPQB.DE. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBUM.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPQB.DE.
Performance
CBUM.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUM.DE achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly higher than SPQB.DE's 7.07% return.
CBUM.DE
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 1Y
- 20.50%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPQB.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 7.07%
- 1Y
- 14.84%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUM.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUM.DE iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 8.15% | 15.88% | 21.99% | 18.14% |
SPQB.DE Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF | 7.07% | -0.77% | 20.64% | 4.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUM.DE and SPQB.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2023 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUM.DE vs. SPQB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUM.DE
SPQB.DE
CBUM.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CBUM.DE) and Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF (SPQB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBUM.DE | SPQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.38 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 4.81 | -2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.58 | 13.86 | -4.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBUM.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUM.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.25%, which is greater than SPQB.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUM.DE and SPQB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUM.DE | SPQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.25% | -16.15% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.99% | -3.10% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.25% | -16.15% | -3.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -1.04% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -2.84% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 1.07% | +1.06% |
Volatility
CBUM.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CBUM.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF (SPQB.DE) at 1.75%. This indicates that CBUM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPQB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUM.DE | SPQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 1.75% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.33% | 4.40% | +4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 7.45% | +4.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 9.87% | +5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 9.87% | +5.14% |
CBUM.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUM.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SPQB.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUM.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUM.DE nor SPQB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUM.DE and SPQB.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUM.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUM.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SPQB.DE.
CBUM.DE tracks S&P 500 Scored & Screened Index (EUR Hedged), while SPQB.DE tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% WHT Quarterly 5% Buffer Protect. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CBUM.DE and 0.50% for SPQB.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUM.DE and SPQB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer