ZNQ.TO vs. VIDY.TO
ZNQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF) and VIDY.TO (Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZNQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while VIDY.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZNQ.TO returned 16.19%/yr vs 16.44%/yr for VIDY.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZNQ.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for VIDY.TO.
Performance
ZNQ.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZNQ.TO achieves a 14.59% return, which is significantly lower than VIDY.TO's 17.58% return.
ZNQ.TO
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- 6M
- 13.21%
- YTD
- 14.59%
- 1Y
- 25.42%
- 3Y*
- 24.86%
- 5Y*
- 16.19%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.91%
VIDY.TO
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 13.54%
- YTD
- 17.58%
- 1Y
- 31.61%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$1.96M | CA$2.16M | CA$2.22M | |
| CA$2.18M | CA$4.88M | CA$3.43M |
ZNQ.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF | 14.59% | 14.95% | 35.84% | 51.32% | -28.06% | 26.59% | 44.65% | 22.53% |
VIDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 17.58% | 35.07% | 11.97% | 15.46% | 1.57% | 14.26% | -2.63% | 10.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZNQ.TO and VIDY.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2019 | 0.42 |
ZNQ.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZNQ.TO
VIDY.TO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
ZNQ.TO
VIDY.TO
Communication Services
ZNQ.TO
VIDY.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZNQ.TO
VIDY.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZNQ.TO
VIDY.TO
Industrials
ZNQ.TO
VIDY.TO
Healthcare
ZNQ.TO
VIDY.TO
Utilities
ZNQ.TO
VIDY.TO
Basic Materials
ZNQ.TO
VIDY.TO
Energy
ZNQ.TO
VIDY.TO
Financial Services
ZNQ.TO
VIDY.TO
Real Estate
ZNQ.TO
VIDY.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZNQ.TO vs. VIDY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZNQ.TO
VIDY.TO
ZNQ.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VIDY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZNQ.TO | VIDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.44 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 3.03 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.21 | 11.68 | -5.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZNQ.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZNQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.09%, roughly equal to the maximum VIDY.TO drawdown of -31.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZNQ.TO and VIDY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZNQ.TO | VIDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.09% | -31.99% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.24% | -10.48% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.67% | -13.89% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.09% | -19.01% | -13.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.85% | -0.11% | -7.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -4.21% | -2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.10% | 2.71% | +1.39% |
Volatility
ZNQ.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.21% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VIDY.TO) at 3.19%. This indicates that ZNQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIDY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZNQ.TO | VIDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 3.19% | +4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.40% | 11.10% | +4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.74% | 13.27% | +5.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 13.53% | +7.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.48% | 16.38% | +6.10% |
ZNQ.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZNQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VIDY.TO's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZNQ.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZNQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than VIDY.TO's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 2.87% | 2.80% | 3.64% | 3.91% | 4.39% | 3.30% | 3.36% | 3.37% | 0.02% |
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF | 0.22% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZNQ.TO and VIDY.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VIDY.TO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VIDY.TO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZNQ.TO.
ZNQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VIDY.TO is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ZNQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while VIDY.TO tracks FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZNQ.TO and 0.31% for VIDY.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZNQ.TO and VIDY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer