ZMP.TO vs. HPYM.TO
ZMP.TO (BMO Mid Provincial Bond Index ETF) and HPYM.TO (Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units) are both Government Bonds funds. Over the past year, ZMP.TO returned 4.10% vs 1.54% for HPYM.TO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ZMP.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZMP.TO achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly higher than HPYM.TO's -0.87% return.
ZMP.TO
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 5.19%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- 1.80%
HPYM.TO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 6M
- -1.15%
- 1Y
- 1.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZMP.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZMP.TO BMO Mid Provincial Bond Index ETF | 2.28% | 4.45% | 5.77% |
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units | -0.87% | 6.72% | -0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZMP.TO and HPYM.TO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between ZMP.TO and HPYM.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZMP.TO vs. HPYM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZMP.TO
HPYM.TO
ZMP.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Mid Provincial Bond Index ETF (ZMP.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZMP.TO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.06 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 0.40 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 1.01 | +2.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZMP.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZMP.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, which is greater than HPYM.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMP.TO and HPYM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZMP.TO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.53% | -6.19% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.98% | -3.87% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -2.35% | +2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -1.95% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | 1.52% | -0.31% |
Volatility
ZMP.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Mid Provincial Bond Index ETF (ZMP.TO) is 1.14%, while Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that ZMP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HPYM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZMP.TO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 1.72% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.50% | 3.60% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.45% | 4.67% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.60% | 5.62% | +0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 5.62% | 0.00% |
Dividends
ZMP.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZMP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than HPYM.TO's 9.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units | 9.31% | 9.01% | 8.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZMP.TO BMO Mid Provincial Bond Index ETF | 3.16% | 2.93% | 2.92% | 2.97% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 2.52% | 2.69% | 2.71% | 2.93% | 2.93% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZMP.TO and HPYM.TO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Harvest.
Find the right allocation for ZMP.TO and HPYM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer