ZMAY vs. XJUN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ZMAY (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May) and XJUN (FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June) are both Defined Outcome funds. ZMAY is actively managed, while XJUN is passively managed. Over the past year, ZMAY returned 5.93% vs 10.38% for XJUN. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZMAY charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for XJUN.

Performance

ZMAY vs. XJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMAY achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly lower than XJUN's 3.11% return.

ZMAY

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 2.24%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 5.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XJUN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 3.11%
• 6M: 3.77%
• 1Y: 10.38%
• 3Y*: 10.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMAY vs. XJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZMAY Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May	2.24%	4.67%
XJUN FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June	3.11%	11.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ZMAY and XJUN is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025	0.67

The correlation between ZMAY and XJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZMAY vs. XJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMAY

ZMAY Risk / Return Rank: 97
ZMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ZMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ZMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ZMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ZMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 98

XJUN

XJUN Risk / Return Rank: 93
XJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
XJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 95
XJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
XJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMAY vs. XJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZMAY	XJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.11	3.10	+1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.32	4.91	+2.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.95	1.72	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.23	5.29	+9.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	70.67	30.91	+39.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZMAY vs. XJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZMAY Sharpe Ratio is 4.11, which is higher than the XJUN Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZMAY and XJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZMAY	XJUN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.11	3.10	+1.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.26	1.20	+3.06

Drawdowns

ZMAY vs. XJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMAY drawdown since its inception was -0.39%, smaller than the maximum XJUN drawdown of -9.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMAY and XJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZMAY	XJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.39%	-9.14%	+8.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.39%	-1.97%	+1.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-0.01%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.05%	-0.89%	+0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.08%	0.34%	-0.26%

Volatility

ZMAY vs. XJUN - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY) has a higher volatility of 0.50% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) at 0.27%. This indicates that ZMAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZMAY	XJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.50%	0.27%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.06%	2.46%	-1.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45%	3.36%	-1.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.52%	7.18%	-5.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.52%	7.18%	-5.66%

ZMAY vs. XJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than XJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZMAY vs. XJUN - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZMAY nor XJUN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZMAY and XJUN in my portfolio?

ZMAY and XJUN have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZMAY or XJUN?

ZMAY has higher volatility (0.50%) compared to XJUN (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZMAY dropped -0.39% vs XJUN's -9.14%.

Which ETF is better, ZMAY or XJUN?

On 1-year performance, XJUN leads with 10.38% vs 5.93% for ZMAY. On fees, ZMAY is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZMAY or XJUN?

Over the 1-year period, XJUN has performed better with a 10.38% return vs 5.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZMAY or XJUN?

ZMAY is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZMAY or XJUN?

ZMAY and XJUN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ZMAY and XJUN?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZMAY and 0.85% for XJUN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 3.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.