ZLU.TO vs. SCHD
ZLU.TO (BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD)) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZLU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. ZLU.TO is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZLU.TO returned 9.43%/yr vs 13.54%/yr for SCHD. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZLU.TO charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZLU.TO is traded in CAD, while SCHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZLU.TO achieves a 9.40% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ZLU.TO has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 9.43%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.54% annualized return.
ZLU.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 9.40%
- 6M
- 3.31%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 20.03%
- 6M
- 17.69%
- 1Y
- 28.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZLU.TO BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD) | 9.40% | 1.95% | 21.52% | -3.36% | 7.85% | 20.62% | 1.98% | 20.39% | 8.31% | 4.98% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.52% | -0.44% | 21.25% | 2.24% | 3.64% | 28.70% | 13.08% | 21.03% | 2.45% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZLU.TO and SCHD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2013 | 0.63 |
The correlation between ZLU.TO and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZLU.TO
SCHD
Utilities
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
ZLU.TO
SCHD
Technology
ZLU.TO
SCHD
Healthcare
ZLU.TO
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
ZLU.TO
SCHD
Financial Services
ZLU.TO
SCHD
Industrials
ZLU.TO
SCHD
Real Estate
ZLU.TO
SCHD
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZLU.TO
SCHD
Communication Services
ZLU.TO
SCHD
Basic Materials
ZLU.TO
SCHD
Energy
ZLU.TO
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZLU.TO vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
ZLU.TO
SCHD
ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD) (ZLU.TO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZLU.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.47 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 6.61 | -5.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.38 | 19.13 | -15.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZLU.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 2.57 | -1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.90 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 1.12 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZLU.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.49%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLU.TO and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZLU.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.49% | -26.93% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -4.30% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.17% | -15.30% | +6.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.40% | -15.30% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.49% | -26.93% | +1.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -1.22% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -2.86% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 1.48% | +1.49% |
Volatility
ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD) (ZLU.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.63%. This indicates that ZLU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZLU.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 2.63% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.51% | 8.23% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.46% | 11.10% | -0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.34% | 12.63% | -1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 15.18% | -1.27% |
ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZLU.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
ZLU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
ZLU.TO BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD) | 1.73% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 1.69% | 1.75% | 1.51% | 1.81% | 1.91% | 2.26% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZLU.TO and SCHD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for ZLU.TO.
ZLU.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for ZLU.TO and 0.06% for SCHD.
Find the right allocation for ZLU.TO and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer