PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZLU.TO vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD) (ZLU.TO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZLU.TO is traded in CAD, while SCHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZLU.TO achieves a 9.40% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ZLU.TO has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 9.43%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.54% annualized return.


ZLU.TO

1D
-0.14%
1M
4.18%
YTD
9.40%
6M
3.31%
1Y
9.98%
3Y*
10.83%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
9.43%

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
4.32%
YTD
20.03%
6M
17.69%
1Y
28.28%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
13.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZLU.TO
BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD)
9.40%1.95%21.52%-3.36%7.85%20.62%1.98%20.39%8.31%4.98%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
20.52%-0.44%21.25%2.24%3.64%28.70%13.08%21.03%2.45%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ZLU.TO and SCHD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2013

0.63

The correlation between ZLU.TO and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZLU.TO
SCHD

Utilities

20.5%
0.0%

Technology

19.0%
16.4%

Healthcare

17.7%
18.8%

Consumer Defensive

12.5%
19.2%

Financial Services

11.4%
9.3%

Industrials

6.4%
7.5%

Real Estate

3.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.2%
6.3%

Communication Services

2.9%
6.3%

Basic Materials

2.5%
1.2%

Energy

0.6%
16.2%

Utilities

ZLU.TO
20.5%
SCHD
0.0%

Technology

ZLU.TO
19.0%
SCHD
16.4%

Healthcare

ZLU.TO
17.7%
SCHD
18.8%

Consumer Defensive

ZLU.TO
12.5%
SCHD
19.2%

Financial Services

ZLU.TO
11.4%
SCHD
9.3%

Industrials

ZLU.TO
6.4%
SCHD
7.5%

Real Estate

ZLU.TO
3.3%
SCHD

-

Consumer Cyclical

ZLU.TO
3.2%
SCHD
6.3%

Communication Services

ZLU.TO
2.9%
SCHD
6.3%

Basic Materials

ZLU.TO
2.5%
SCHD
1.2%

Energy

ZLU.TO
0.6%
SCHD
16.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZLU.TO vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZLU.TO
ZLU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
ZLU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD) (ZLU.TO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZLU.TOSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.47

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

6.61

-5.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

19.13

-15.75

ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZLU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZLU.TO and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZLU.TOSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

2.57

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.90

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.90

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

1.12

-0.15

Drawdowns

ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZLU.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.49%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLU.TO and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZLU.TOSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.49%

-26.93%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-4.30%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.17%

-15.30%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.40%

-15.30%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.49%

-26.93%

+1.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-1.22%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-2.86%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

1.48%

+1.49%

Volatility

ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD) (ZLU.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.63%. This indicates that ZLU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZLU.TOSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.63%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

8.23%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.46%

11.10%

-0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.34%

12.63%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.91%

15.18%

-1.27%

ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZLU.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZLU.TO vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

ZLU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
ZLU.TO
BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (CAD)
1.73%1.89%1.89%2.29%1.87%1.69%1.75%1.51%1.81%1.91%2.26%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZLU.TO and SCHD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for ZLU.TO.

ZLU.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for ZLU.TO and 0.06% for SCHD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZLU.TO and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer