PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZLSC.TO vs. ZEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZLSC.TO vs. ZEQT.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ZLSC.TO (BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF) and ZEQT.TO (BMO All-Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZLSC.TO is a Long-Short fund actively managed by BMO, while ZEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by BMO. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZLSC.TO returned 23.82% vs 32.71% for ZEQT.TO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZLSC.TO charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ZEQT.TO.

Performance

ZLSC.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF (ZLSC.TO) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZLSC.TO achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly lower than ZEQT.TO's 13.63% return.

ZLSC.TO

1D
0.21%
1M
2.67%
YTD
9.76%
6M
10.37%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ZEQT.TO

1D
0.52%
1M
6.10%
YTD
13.63%
6M
13.00%
1Y
32.71%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZLSC.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZLSC.TO
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF		9.76%20.54%21.20%4.25%
ZEQT.TO
BMO All-Equity ETF		13.63%19.67%25.44%8.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ZLSC.TO and ZEQT.TO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023

0.44

The correlation between ZLSC.TO and ZEQT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF

BMO All-Equity ETF

Often compared with ZLSC.TO:
ZLSC.TO vs. ZMMK.TOZLSC.TO vs. ZCN.TOZLSC.TO vs. ZAG.TOZLSC.TO vs. ZLB.TOZLSC.TO vs. ZSP.TOZLSC.TO vs. ZUQ.TOZLSC.TO vs. ZEB.TO
Often compared with ZEQT.TO:
ZEQT.TO vs. XEQT.TOZEQT.TO vs. VEQT.TOZEQT.TO vs. ZSP.TOZEQT.TO vs. VFV.TOZEQT.TO vs. HEQT.TOZEQT.TO vs. VGRO.TOZEQT.TO vs. TEQT.TO

Return for Risk

ZLSC.TO vs. ZEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZLSC.TO
ZLSC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZLSC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLSC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLSC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLSC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLSC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO
ZEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ZEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZLSC.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF (ZLSC.TO) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ZLSC.TOZEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.15
2.58

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.27
3.57

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.47

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.04

3.77

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.77

15.90

+9.88

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZLSC.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZLSC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is comparable to the ZEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZLSC.TO and ZEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ZLSC.TOZEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15

2.58

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.56

1.20

+1.35

Drawdowns

ZLSC.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZLSC.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.37%, smaller than the maximum ZEQT.TO drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLSC.TO and ZEQT.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZLSC.TOZEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.37%

-16.87%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.75%

-8.72%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-15.34%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.64%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-3.01%

+2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

2.06%

-1.13%

Volatility

ZLSC.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF (ZLSC.TO) is 1.40%, while BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that ZLSC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZLSC.TOZEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

5.21%

-3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.85%

10.42%

-4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.60%

12.75%

-5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.32%

13.85%

-5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.32%

13.85%

-5.53%

ZLSC.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZLSC.TO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEQT.TO's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZLSC.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZLSC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than ZEQT.TO's 1.28% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022
ZEQT.TO
BMO All-Equity ETF		1.28%1.45%1.69%2.13%2.43%
ZLSC.TO
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF		1.18%1.45%2.22%0.90%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZLSC.TO and ZEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for ZLSC.TO.

ZLSC.TO is categorized as Long-Short, while ZEQT.TO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for ZLSC.TO and 0.18% for ZEQT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZLSC.TO and ZEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer