ZLD.TO vs. FINT.TO
ZLD.TO (BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF) and FINT.TO (First Trust International Capital Strength ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZLD.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while FINT.TO is a Global Equities fund tracking the No Index (Active ETF). ZLD.TO is actively managed, while FINT.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZLD.TO returned 6.55%/yr vs 7.95%/yr for FINT.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZLD.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for FINT.TO.
Performance
ZLD.TO vs. FINT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZLD.TO achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than FINT.TO's 11.92% return.
ZLD.TO
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- YTD
- 6.24%
- 1Y
- 6.23%
- 3Y*
- 10.00%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 6.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.25%
FINT.TO
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- 6M
- 6.40%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 1Y
- 20.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$8.27K | CA$22.90K | CA$26.32K | |
| CA$27.40K | CA$45.76K | CA$88.31K |
ZLD.TO vs. FINT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZLD.TO BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF | 6.24% | 9.63% | 11.11% | 11.37% | -6.68% | 12.56% | -5.85% | 17.60% | -4.26% |
FINT.TO First Trust International Capital Strength ETF | 11.92% | 28.55% | 6.00% | 11.49% | -14.84% | 12.52% | 14.71% | 31.52% | -19.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZLD.TO and FINT.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2018 | 0.26 |
ZLD.TO vs. FINT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZLD.TO
FINT.TO
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Financial Services
ZLD.TO
FINT.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZLD.TO
FINT.TO
Communication Services
ZLD.TO
FINT.TO
Healthcare
ZLD.TO
FINT.TO
Industrials
ZLD.TO
FINT.TO
Utilities
ZLD.TO
FINT.TO
-
Real Estate
ZLD.TO
FINT.TO
-
Technology
ZLD.TO
FINT.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZLD.TO
FINT.TO
Basic Materials
ZLD.TO
FINT.TO
Energy
ZLD.TO
FINT.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZLD.TO vs. FINT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZLD.TO
FINT.TO
ZLD.TO vs. FINT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLD.TO) and First Trust International Capital Strength ETF (FINT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZLD.TO | FINT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.24 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.77 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.88 | 6.15 | -4.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZLD.TO vs. FINT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.97%, roughly equal to the maximum FINT.TO drawdown of -29.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLD.TO and FINT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZLD.TO | FINT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.97% | -29.12% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -11.82% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.47% | -14.37% | +6.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.02% | -28.43% | +13.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -5.83% | +4.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -7.12% | +3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 3.41% | -0.09% |
Volatility
ZLD.TO vs. FINT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF (ZLD.TO) is 2.32%, while First Trust International Capital Strength ETF (FINT.TO) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that ZLD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FINT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZLD.TO | FINT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.32% | 4.64% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.50% | 13.92% | -7.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.50% | 16.69% | -8.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.99% | 15.17% | -5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.81% | 17.42% | -4.61% |
ZLD.TO vs. FINT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZLD.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FINT.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZLD.TO vs. FINT.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZLD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than FINT.TO's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FINT.TO First Trust International Capital Strength ETF | 1.95% | 2.00% | 1.42% | 2.00% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZLD.TO BMO Low Volatility International Equity Hedged to CAD ETF | 2.18% | 2.29% | 2.45% | 2.66% | 2.62% | 2.31% | 2.62% | 2.17% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZLD.TO and FINT.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZLD.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZLD.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for FINT.TO.
ZLD.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FINT.TO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ZLD.TO and 0.76% for FINT.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZLD.TO and FINT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer