PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZLB.TO vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZLB.TO vs. SPMO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ZLB.TO (BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZLB.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. ZLB.TO is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZLB.TO returned 10.66%/yr vs 21.90%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZLB.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.

Performance

ZLB.TO vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZLB.TO is traded in CAD, while SPMO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPMO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZLB.TO achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ZLB.TO has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 10.66%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.90% annualized return.

ZLB.TO

1D
0.11%
1M
4.51%
YTD
5.69%
6M
2.84%
1Y
13.21%
3Y*
15.21%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
10.66%

SPMO

1D
1.49%
1M
6.37%
YTD
30.81%
6M
30.60%
1Y
46.76%
3Y*
43.67%
5Y*
27.13%
10Y*
21.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZLB.TO vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF		5.69%20.40%15.31%9.41%-0.35%22.93%1.51%21.92%-2.76%11.11%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF		30.89%20.80%58.16%14.76%-4.78%22.58%25.21%20.74%7.41%19.11%

Correlation

The correlation between ZLB.TO and SPMO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between ZLB.TO and SPMO has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ZLB.TO vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ZLB.TO
SPMO

Financial Services

23.9%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

18.3%
4.0%

Utilities

17.6%
2.5%

Industrials

10.0%
10.9%

Communication Services

9.3%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
1.3%

Basic Materials

6.2%
1.6%

Real Estate

4.3%
0.9%

Technology

1.9%
54.8%

Energy

-

3.1%

Healthcare

-

6.2%

Financial Services

ZLB.TO
23.9%
SPMO
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

ZLB.TO
18.3%
SPMO
4.0%

Utilities

ZLB.TO
17.6%
SPMO
2.5%

Industrials

ZLB.TO
10.0%
SPMO
10.9%

Communication Services

ZLB.TO
9.3%
SPMO
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ZLB.TO
8.5%
SPMO
1.3%

Basic Materials

ZLB.TO
6.2%
SPMO
1.6%

Real Estate

ZLB.TO
4.3%
SPMO
0.9%

Technology

ZLB.TO
1.9%
SPMO
54.8%

Energy

ZLB.TO

-

SPMO
3.1%

Healthcare

ZLB.TO

-

SPMO
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF

Often compared with ZLB.TO:
ZLB.TO vs. VDY.TOZLB.TO vs. XIU.TOZLB.TO vs. XDIV.TOZLB.TO vs. XMW.TOZLB.TO vs. XBAL.TOZLB.TO vs. XUT.TOZLB.TO vs. XEG.TO
Often compared with SPMO:
SPMO vs. VOOSPMO vs. QQQSPMO vs. SCHGSPMO vs. MTUMSPMO vs. VUGSPMO vs. VFMOSPMO vs. XMMO

Return for Risk

ZLB.TO vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZLB.TO
ZLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZLB.TO vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ZLB.TOSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.44
2.38

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.96
3.17

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.63

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.85

12.12

-5.28

ZLB.TO vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZLB.TO and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZLB.TO vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZLB.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -26.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLB.TO and SPMO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZLB.TOSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.96%

-26.80%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-12.95%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.01%

-21.35%

+13.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.00%

-21.43%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.96%

-26.80%

-7.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-4.16%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

3.87%

-1.94%

Volatility

ZLB.TO vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) is 2.63%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.32%. This indicates that ZLB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZLB.TOSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

10.32%

-7.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

16.96%

-9.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26%

19.72%

-10.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.62%

20.54%

-10.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.22%

21.56%

-9.34%

ZLB.TO vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZLB.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZLB.TO vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

ZLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than SPMO's 0.67% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF		0.67%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF		1.88%1.99%2.37%2.67%2.66%2.39%2.83%2.44%2.76%2.55%2.94%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZLB.TO and SPMO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZLB.TO.

ZLB.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZLB.TO and 0.13% for SPMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZLB.TO and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer