ZLB.TO vs. LVHI
ZLB.TO (BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZLB.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. ZLB.TO is actively managed, while LVHI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZLB.TO returned 10.98%/yr vs 18.97%/yr for LVHI. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZLB.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
ZLB.TO vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZLB.TO is traded in CAD, while LVHI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LVHI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZLB.TO achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 13.44% return.
ZLB.TO
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 3.94%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 12.65%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.42%
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 13.44%
- 6M
- 14.41%
- 1Y
- 31.85%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 18.97%
- 10Y*
- —
ZLB.TO vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 3.94% | 20.40% | 15.31% | 9.41% | -0.35% | 22.93% | 1.51% | 21.92% | -2.76% | 11.11% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.48% | 21.32% | 24.53% | 14.66% | 10.42% | 18.13% | -10.92% | 13.47% | 2.75% | 4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZLB.TO and LVHI is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016 | 0.42 |
ZLB.TO vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZLB.TO
LVHI
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
ZLB.TO
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
ZLB.TO
LVHI
Utilities
ZLB.TO
LVHI
Industrials
ZLB.TO
LVHI
Communication Services
ZLB.TO
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
ZLB.TO
LVHI
Basic Materials
ZLB.TO
LVHI
Real Estate
ZLB.TO
LVHI
Technology
ZLB.TO
LVHI
Energy
ZLB.TO
-
LVHI
Healthcare
ZLB.TO
-
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZLB.TO vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
ZLB.TO
LVHI
ZLB.TO vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZLB.TO | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.55 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 5.65 | -3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.56 | 19.22 | -12.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZLB.TO | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 3.09 | -1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | 1.48 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.77 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
ZLB.TO vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZLB.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -29.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLB.TO and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZLB.TO | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.96% | -29.52% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -5.66% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.01% | -12.48% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.00% | -12.48% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -0.53% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -4.54% | +2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 1.66% | +0.27% |
Volatility
ZLB.TO vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) have volatilities of 2.74% and 2.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZLB.TO | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 2.66% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.54% | 8.42% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.23% | 10.37% | -1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.62% | 12.84% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.22% | 15.36% | -3.14% |
ZLB.TO vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZLB.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZLB.TO vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
ZLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than LVHI's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.79% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 1.91% | 1.99% | 2.37% | 2.67% | 2.66% | 2.39% | 2.83% | 2.44% | 2.76% | 2.55% | 2.94% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZLB.TO and LVHI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZLB.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZLB.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
ZLB.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZLB.TO and 0.40% for LVHI.
Find the right allocation for ZLB.TO and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer