ZJYL vs. SWVL
ZJYL (Jin Medical International Ltd) and SWVL (Swvl Holdings Corp) are both stocks. ZJYL operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while SWVL operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 3 years, ZJYL returned -46.61%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for SWVL. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ZJYL vs. SWVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZJYL achieves a -55.00% return, which is significantly lower than SWVL's -27.37% return.
ZJYL
- 1D
- 3.66%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- 6M
- -28.00%
- YTD
- -55.00%
- 1Y
- -84.55%
- 3Y*
- -46.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -34.14%
SWVL
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- 6M
- -23.76%
- YTD
- -27.37%
- 1Y
- -63.59%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -69.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.56K | $24.90K | $42.75K | |
| $46.77K | $30.94K | $902.88K |
ZJYL vs. SWVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZJYL Jin Medical International Ltd | -55.00% | -71.73% | -93.73% | 3,000.62% |
SWVL Swvl Holdings Corp | -27.37% | -70.23% | 281.39% | 28.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZJYL and SWVL is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
ZJYL:
$15.50M
SWVL:
$13.75M
ZJYL:
$44.19M
SWVL:
$18.26M
ZJYL:
$15.78M
SWVL:
$3.93M
ZJYL:
$4.75M
SWVL:
-$3.28M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZJYL vs. SWVL — Risk / Return Rank
ZJYL
SWVL
ZJYL vs. SWVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jin Medical International Ltd (ZJYL) and Swvl Holdings Corp (SWVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZJYL | SWVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.84 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.95 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | -1.29 | +0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZJYL vs. SWVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZJYL drawdown since its inception was -99.34%, roughly equal to the maximum SWVL drawdown of -99.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZJYL and SWVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZJYL | SWVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.34% | -99.72% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.35% | -68.79% | -20.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.34% | -92.32% | -7.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.28% | -99.45% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.69% | -93.84% | +21.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 73.29% | 50.50% | +22.79% |
Volatility
ZJYL vs. SWVL - Volatility Comparison
Jin Medical International Ltd (ZJYL) has a higher volatility of 21.81% compared to Swvl Holdings Corp (SWVL) at 17.62%. This indicates that ZJYL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZJYL | SWVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.81% | 17.62% | +4.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.62% | 56.56% | +10.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 99.59% | 77.48% | +22.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 215.27% | 137.82% | +77.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 215.27% | 137.82% | +77.45% |
Dividends
ZJYL vs. SWVL - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZJYL nor SWVL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ZJYL vs. SWVL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jin Medical International Ltd and Swvl Holdings Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ZJYL and SWVL have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZJYL has higher volatility (21.81%) compared to SWVL (17.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZJYL dropped -99.34% vs SWVL's -99.72%.
SWVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.85 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZJYL and SWVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer