PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWVL vs. ROOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SWVL vs. ROOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Swvl Holdings Corp (SWVL) and Root, Inc. (ROOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWVL achieves a -23.68% return, which is significantly lower than ROOT's -13.71% return.


SWVL

1D
0.69%
1M
5.07%
6M
-36.12%
YTD
-23.68%
1Y
-69.47%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
10Y*

ROOT

1D
-3.15%
1M
13.53%
6M
-21.70%
YTD
-13.71%
1Y
-46.16%
3Y*
84.96%
5Y*
-15.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWVL vs. ROOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SWVL
Swvl Holdings Corp
-23.68%-70.23%281.39%-51.14%-98.60%
ROOT
Root, Inc.
-13.71%-0.50%592.65%133.41%-88.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SWVL and ROOT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2022

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SWVL:

$14.45M

ROOT:

$873.87M

Total Revenue (TTM)

SWVL:

$18.26M

ROOT:

$1.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SWVL:

$3.93M

ROOT:

$279.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

SWVL:

-$3.28M

ROOT:

$88.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWVL vs. ROOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWVL
SWVL Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
SWVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWVL Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SWVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWVL Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ROOT
ROOT Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ROOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ROOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROOT Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWVL vs. ROOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swvl Holdings Corp (SWVL) and Root, Inc. (ROOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWVLROOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

0.91

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

-0.69

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

-0.97

-0.34

SWVL vs. ROOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWVL Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the ROOT Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWVL and ROOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWVL vs. ROOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWVL drawdown since its inception was -99.72%, roughly equal to the maximum ROOT drawdown of -99.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWVL and ROOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWVLROOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.72%

-99.29%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.44%

-67.10%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.32%

-75.68%

-16.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.43%

-87.17%

-12.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.76%

-83.80%

-9.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.06%

47.43%

+5.63%

Volatility

SWVL vs. ROOT - Volatility Comparison

Swvl Holdings Corp (SWVL) and Root, Inc. (ROOT) have volatilities of 22.59% and 23.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWVLROOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.59%

23.16%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.60%

47.59%

+14.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.94%

69.13%

+8.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

138.63%

101.79%

+36.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

138.63%

99.77%

+38.86%

Dividends

SWVL vs. ROOT - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWVL nor ROOT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SWVL vs. ROOT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Swvl Holdings Corp and Root, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
5.28M
393.50M
(SWVL) Total Revenue
(ROOT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SWVL and ROOT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROOT has higher volatility (23.16%) compared to SWVL (22.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWVL dropped -99.72% vs ROOT's -99.29%.

ROOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWVL and ROOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer