SWVL vs. ROOT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SWVL (Swvl Holdings Corp) and ROOT (Root, Inc.) are both stocks. SWVL operates in Software - Application (Technology), while ROOT operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, SWVL returned 7.21%/yr vs 70.47%/yr for ROOT. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

SWVL vs. ROOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Swvl Holdings Corp (SWVL) and Root, Inc. (ROOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWVL achieves a -27.37% return, which is significantly lower than ROOT's -25.03% return.

SWVL

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -1.43%
• 6M: -23.76%
• YTD: -27.37%
• 1Y: -63.59%
• 3Y*: 7.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -69.71%

ROOT

• 1D: -6.70%
• 1M: -12.28%
• 6M: -12.84%
• YTD: -25.03%
• 1Y: -53.61%
• 3Y*: 70.47%
• 5Y*: -16.98%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -31.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ROOT Root, Inc.	$10.74M	$12.78M	$15.16M
SWVL Swvl Holdings Corp	$23.56K	$24.90K	$42.75K

SWVL vs. ROOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SWVL Swvl Holdings Corp	-27.37%	-70.23%	281.39%	-51.14%	-98.60%
ROOT Root, Inc.	-25.03%	-0.50%	592.65%	133.41%	-88.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SWVL and ROOT is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2022	0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap SWVL : $13.75M ROOT : $759.19M
Total Revenue (TTM) SWVL : $18.26M ROOT : $1.56B
Gross Profit (TTM) SWVL : $3.93M ROOT : $279.50M
EBITDA (TTM) SWVL : -$3.28M ROOT : $88.80M

Return for Risk

SWVL vs. ROOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWVL

SWVL Risk / Return Rank: 8
SWVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
SWVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
SWVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9
SWVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
SWVL Martin Ratio Rank: 12

ROOT

ROOT Risk / Return Rank: 12
ROOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
ROOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
ROOT Omega Ratio Rank: 12
ROOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
ROOT Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWVL vs. ROOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swvl Holdings Corp (SWVL) and Root, Inc. (ROOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWVL	ROOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.85	-0.80	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.41	-1.07	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	0.87	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	-0.84	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.29	-1.18	-0.12

SWVL vs. ROOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWVL Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is comparable to the ROOT Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWVL and ROOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SWVL vs. ROOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWVL drawdown since its inception was -99.72%, roughly equal to the maximum ROOT drawdown of -99.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWVL and ROOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWVL	ROOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.72%	-99.29%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.79%	-65.58%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-92.32%	-75.68%	-16.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-97.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.45%	-88.86%	-10.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-93.84%	-83.84%	-10.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	50.50%	47.02%	+3.48%

Volatility

SWVL vs. ROOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Swvl Holdings Corp (SWVL) is 17.62%, while Root, Inc. (ROOT) has a volatility of 19.08%. This indicates that SWVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWVL	ROOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.62%	19.08%	-1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.56%	49.20%	+7.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.48%	69.48%	+8.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	137.82%	101.91%	+35.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	137.82%	99.54%	+38.28%

Dividends

SWVL vs. ROOT - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWVL nor ROOT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWVL and ROOT in my portfolio?

SWVL and ROOT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWVL or ROOT?

ROOT has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to SWVL (17.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWVL dropped -99.72% vs ROOT's -99.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.80 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.