PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZJUL vs. POCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZJUL vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July (ZJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZJUL vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZJUL achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's -1.42% return.


ZJUL

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
1.11%
1Y
8.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POCT

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
0.25%
1Y
11.10%
3Y*
11.03%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZJUL vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZJUL and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

ZJUL vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZJUL
ZJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ZJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ZJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZJUL vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July (ZJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZJULPOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

1.08

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

1.62

+0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.26

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

1.59

+0.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.52

8.53

+3.99

ZJUL vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZJUL and POCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZJULPOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.08

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

0.79

+0.58

Correlation

The correlation between ZJUL and POCT is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ZJUL vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZJUL nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ZJUL
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%

Drawdowns

ZJUL vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZJUL drawdown since its inception was -5.51%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZJUL and POCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZJULPOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-18.80%

+13.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.64%

-7.20%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-2.33%

+1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-1.53%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

1.34%

-0.66%

Volatility

ZJUL vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July (ZJUL) is 1.23%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that ZJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZJULPOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

3.31%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

5.15%

-3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.11%

10.35%

-5.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.82%

7.90%

-3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.82%

10.31%

-5.49%