PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZJUL vs. BAMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZJUL vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July (ZJUL) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZJUL achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.18% return.


ZJUL

1D
0.12%
1M
0.42%
YTD
2.84%
6M
2.82%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAMU

1D
0.02%
1M
0.16%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.23%
1Y
2.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZJUL vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZJUL
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July
2.84%7.47%4.06%
BAMU
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF
1.18%3.21%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between ZJUL and BAMU is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZJUL vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZJUL
ZJUL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ZJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

BAMU
BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZJUL vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July (ZJUL) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZJULBAMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

2.43

-0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

24.72

-19.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.59

97.90

-70.31

ZJUL vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZJUL and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZJUL vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZJUL drawdown since its inception was -5.51%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZJUL and BAMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZJULBAMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-0.36%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.43%

-0.12%

-1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.45%

-0.02%

-0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

0.03%

+0.23%

Volatility

ZJUL vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July (ZJUL) has a higher volatility of 0.19% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that ZJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZJULBAMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.19%

0.09%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.80%

0.40%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47%

0.58%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.59%

0.87%

+3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.59%

0.87%

+3.72%

ZJUL vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZJUL vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

ZJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BAMU
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF
3.05%3.20%3.97%0.84%
ZJUL
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZJUL and BAMU have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZJUL has higher volatility (0.19%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZJUL dropped -5.51% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

On 1-year performance, ZJUL leads with 7.15% vs 2.91% for BAMU. On fees, ZJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZJUL has performed better with a 7.15% return vs 2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for ZJUL.

ZJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZJUL and 1.09% for BAMU.

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 2.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZJUL and BAMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer