ZIVB vs. SPDN
ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) and SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. ZIVB is actively managed, while SPDN is passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZIVB charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPDN.
Performance
ZIVB vs. SPDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDN
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- 6M
- -5.83%
- YTD
- -6.63%
- 1Y
- -12.82%
- 3Y*
- -11.85%
- 5Y*
- -8.01%
- 10Y*
- -12.32%
ZIVB vs. SPDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 33.28% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIVB and SPDN is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIVB vs. SPDN — Risk / Return Rank
ZIVB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPDN
ZIVB vs. SPDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZIVB | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.84 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZIVB vs. SPDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIVB drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SPDN drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVB and SPDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIVB | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -75.31% | +75.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -74.85% | +74.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -48.76% | +48.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.12% | — |
Volatility
ZIVB vs. SPDN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIVB | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.41% | 12.67% | +77.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.41% | 16.97% | +73.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.41% | 18.00% | +72.41% |
ZIVB vs. SPDN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIVB has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIVB vs. SPDN - Dividend Comparison
ZIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than SPDN's 3.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 3.33% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 2.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIVB and SPDN have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
SPDN has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 2.37% for ZIVB.
They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZIVB and 0.50% for SPDN.
Find the right allocation for ZIVB and SPDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer