ZIVB vs. JETD
ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) and JETD (MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds. ZIVB is actively managed, while JETD is passively managed. ZIVB charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for JETD.
Performance
ZIVB vs. JETD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JETD
- 1D
- 6.89%
- 1M
- -26.54%
- YTD
- -28.36%
- 6M
- -38.79%
- 1Y
- -63.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZIVB vs. JETD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
JETD MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 16.89% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIVB vs. JETD — Risk / Return Rank
ZIVB
JETD
ZIVB vs. JETD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (JETD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIVB | JETD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.70 | — |
Drawdowns
ZIVB vs. JETD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIVB drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum JETD drawdown of -93.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVB and JETD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIVB | JETD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -93.69% | +93.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -71.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -92.55% | +92.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -61.36% | +61.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 46.84% | — |
Volatility
ZIVB vs. JETD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIVB | JETD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 28.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 58.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 72.36% | -72.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 70.51% | -70.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 70.51% | -70.51% |
ZIVB vs. JETD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIVB has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than JETD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIVB vs. JETD - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZIVB nor JETD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, JETD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JETD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
ZIVB and JETD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZIVB and 0.95% for JETD.
Find the right allocation for ZIVB and JETD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer