ZIVB vs. FLYD
ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) and FLYD (MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both Inverse Equities funds. ZIVB is actively managed, while FLYD is passively managed. ZIVB charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FLYD.
Performance
ZIVB vs. FLYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLYD
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- -17.48%
- YTD
- -13.05%
- 6M
- -22.60%
- 1Y
- -49.08%
- 3Y*
- -55.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZIVB vs. FLYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 4.42% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIVB vs. FLYD — Risk / Return Rank
ZIVB
FLYD
ZIVB vs. FLYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIVB | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.75 | — |
Drawdowns
ZIVB vs. FLYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIVB drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FLYD drawdown of -98.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVB and FLYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIVB | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -98.11% | +98.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -54.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -93.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -97.99% | +97.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -83.14% | +83.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 37.21% | — |
Volatility
ZIVB vs. FLYD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIVB | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 59.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 74.48% | -74.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 83.67% | -83.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 83.67% | -83.67% |
ZIVB vs. FLYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIVB has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLYD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIVB vs. FLYD - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZIVB nor FLYD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, FLYD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLYD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
ZIVB and FLYD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZIVB and 0.95% for FLYD.
Find the right allocation for ZIVB and FLYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer