ZIVB vs. CALF
ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIVB is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while CALF is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. ZIVB is actively managed, while CALF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. ZIVB charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.
Performance
ZIVB vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CALF
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 16.08%
- YTD
- 20.04%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- —
ZIVB vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 33.28% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF | 8.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIVB and CALF is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIVB vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
ZIVB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CALF
ZIVB vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZIVB | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.42 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZIVB vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIVB drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVB and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIVB | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -47.58% | +47.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -10.62% | +10.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.23% | — |
Volatility
ZIVB vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIVB | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.09% | 15.89% | +66.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.09% | 23.27% | +58.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.09% | 25.91% | +56.18% |
ZIVB vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIVB has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIVB vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
ZIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than CALF's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF | 1.14% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 2.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIVB and CALF have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
ZIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.14% for CALF.
ZIVB is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CALF is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZIVB and 0.59% for CALF.
Find the right allocation for ZIVB and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer