ZIVB vs. BITX
ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) and BITX (2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIVB is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while BITX is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the S&P CME Bitcoin Futures Daily Roll Index (200%). ZIVB is actively managed, while BITX is passively managed. ZIVB charges 1.35%/yr vs 2.38%/yr for BITX.
Performance
ZIVB vs. BITX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITX
- 1D
- -5.39%
- 1M
- -34.65%
- YTD
- -52.31%
- 6M
- -58.66%
- 1Y
- -73.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZIVB vs. BITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
BITX 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -21.15% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIVB vs. BITX — Risk / Return Rank
ZIVB
BITX
ZIVB vs. BITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIVB | BITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.04 | — |
Drawdowns
ZIVB vs. BITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIVB drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BITX drawdown of -78.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVB and BITX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIVB | BITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -78.92% | +78.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -78.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -78.92% | +78.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -31.70% | +31.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 50.03% | — |
Volatility
ZIVB vs. BITX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIVB | BITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 69.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 86.83% | -86.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 98.27% | -98.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 98.27% | -98.27% |
ZIVB vs. BITX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIVB has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BITX's 2.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIVB vs. BITX - Dividend Comparison
ZIVB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BITX 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 33.24% | 21.69% | 10.70% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ZIVB is cheaper at 1.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZIVB is cheaper with a 1.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.38% for BITX.
BITX has the higher dividend yield at 33.24%, compared with 0.00% for ZIVB.
ZIVB is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BITX is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZIVB and 2.38% for BITX.
Find the right allocation for ZIVB and BITX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer