ZIVB vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIVB is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. ZIVB charges 1.35%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

ZIVB vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ZIVB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 2.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZIVB vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF	0.00%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	0.06%

Return for Risk

ZIVB vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZIVB vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZIVB	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	4.14	—

Drawdowns

ZIVB vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIVB drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BAMU drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVB and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZIVB	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-0.36%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-0.02%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZIVB	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	0.59%	-0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	0.87%	-0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	0.87%	-0.87%

ZIVB vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZIVB has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZIVB vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

ZIVB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ZIVB or BAMU?

On fees, BAMU is cheaper at 1.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZIVB or BAMU?

BAMU is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZIVB or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for ZIVB.

What is the main difference between ZIVB and BAMU?

ZIVB is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZIVB and 1.09% for BAMU.