ZIU.TO vs. HHIC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZIU.TO (BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) and HHIC.TO (Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. ZIU.TO is passively managed, while HHIC.TO is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZIU.TO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HHIC.TO.

Performance

ZIU.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (ZIU.TO) and Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIU.TO achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than HHIC.TO's 13.62% return.

ZIU.TO

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 3.59%
• YTD: 10.17%
• 6M: 11.84%
• 1Y: 31.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HHIC.TO

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 1.95%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 6M: 15.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZIU.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZIU.TO BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF	10.17%	13.02%
HHIC.TO Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF	13.62%	16.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ZIU.TO and HHIC.TO is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

ZIU.TO vs. HHIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIU.TO

ZIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 83
ZIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ZIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ZIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
ZIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ZIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZIU.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (ZIU.TO) and Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZIU.TO	HHIC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.04	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZIU.TO	HHIC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.18	2.57	-0.40

Drawdowns

ZIU.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIU.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, which is greater than HHIC.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIU.TO and HHIC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZIU.TO	HHIC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.35%	-7.26%	-5.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-0.83%	+0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.30%	-1.47%	+0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZIU.TO	HHIC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.25%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.25%	16.67%	-5.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.42%	16.67%	-4.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.42%	16.67%	-4.25%

ZIU.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZIU.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HHIC.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZIU.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZIU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than HHIC.TO's 10.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HHIC.TO Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF	10.90%	4.77%	0.00%	0.00%
ZIU.TO BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF	2.10%	2.28%	2.70%	0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZIU.TO and HHIC.TO in my portfolio?

ZIU.TO and HHIC.TO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZIU.TO or HHIC.TO?

On fees, ZIU.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZIU.TO or HHIC.TO?

ZIU.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HHIC.TO.

What is the main difference between ZIU.TO and HHIC.TO?

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZIU.TO and 0.40% for HHIC.TO.