ZIU.TO vs. HAL.TO
ZIU.TO (BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) and HAL.TO (Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. ZIU.TO is passively managed, while HAL.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, ZIU.TO returned 31.32% vs 42.29% for HAL.TO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZIU.TO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for HAL.TO.
Performance
ZIU.TO vs. HAL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIU.TO achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than HAL.TO's 17.28% return.
ZIU.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 31.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAL.TO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 20.97%
- 1Y
- 42.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.26%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
ZIU.TO vs. HAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIU.TO BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 10.17% | 28.37% | 21.12% | 10.25% |
HAL.TO Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF | 17.28% | 24.60% | 21.69% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIU.TO and HAL.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023 | 0.63 |
The correlation between ZIU.TO and HAL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIU.TO vs. HAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZIU.TO
HAL.TO
ZIU.TO vs. HAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (ZIU.TO) and Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZIU.TO | HAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.93 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 8.26 | -4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.04 | 37.67 | -18.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIU.TO | HAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 4.46 | -1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.18 | 0.79 | +1.39 |
Drawdowns
ZIU.TO vs. HAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIU.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, smaller than the maximum HAL.TO drawdown of -39.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIU.TO and HAL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIU.TO | HAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.35% | -39.70% | +27.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.88% | -5.15% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | 0.00% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.30% | -4.19% | +2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 1.13% | +0.52% |
Volatility
ZIU.TO vs. HAL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (ZIU.TO) is 2.25%, while Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that ZIU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIU.TO | HAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.25% | 2.48% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.94% | 7.85% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.25% | 9.53% | +1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 12.36% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 14.85% | -2.43% |
ZIU.TO vs. HAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIU.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HAL.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIU.TO vs. HAL.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZIU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than HAL.TO's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL.TO Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF | 1.97% | 2.37% | 2.79% | 3.60% | 4.84% | 2.99% | 3.56% | 2.96% | 3.43% | 3.17% | 2.84% | 3.19% |
ZIU.TO BMO S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 2.10% | 2.28% | 2.70% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIU.TO and HAL.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZIU.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZIU.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for HAL.TO.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZIU.TO and 0.67% for HAL.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZIU.TO and HAL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer