ZIN.TO vs. HDIV.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZIN.TO (BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF) and HDIV.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIN.TO is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index, while HDIV.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. ZIN.TO is passively managed, while HDIV.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZIN.TO returned 20.97%/yr vs 27.58%/yr for HDIV.TO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZIN.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for HDIV.TO.

Performance

ZIN.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIN.TO achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly higher than HDIV.TO's 16.21% return.

ZIN.TO

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 4.65%
• YTD: 22.77%
• 6M: 26.17%
• 1Y: 43.28%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: 13.57%
• 10Y*: 13.42%

HDIV.TO

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 6.14%
• YTD: 16.21%
• 6M: 17.63%
• 1Y: 45.50%
• 3Y*: 27.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZIN.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ZIN.TO BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF	22.77%	16.68%	16.33%	19.36%	-8.06%	1.14%
HDIV.TO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF	16.21%	33.87%	23.15%	13.91%	-2.52%	12.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ZIN.TO and HDIV.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2021	0.48

ZIN.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZIN.TO	HDIV.TO
Industrials	73.8%	3.0%
Energy	10.5%	18.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	2.5%
Utilities	2.8%	4.7%
Basic Materials	2.6%	13.4%
Real Estate	2.4%	2.1%
Financial Services	2.2%	39.8%
Communication Services	-	6.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.3%
Healthcare	-	0.2%
Technology	-	9.5%

Return for Risk

ZIN.TO vs. HDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIN.TO

ZIN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
ZIN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ZIN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ZIN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
ZIN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ZIN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 88

HDIV.TO

HDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 92
HDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
HDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
HDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
HDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
HDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZIN.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZIN.TO	HDIV.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.97	3.67	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.87	4.70	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.68	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.37	5.24	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.31	25.39	-6.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZIN.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZIN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the HDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIN.TO and HDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZIN.TO	HDIV.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.97	3.67	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	1.26	-0.51

Drawdowns

ZIN.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.01%, which is greater than HDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIN.TO and HDIV.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZIN.TO	HDIV.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.01%	-22.32%	-21.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.10%	-8.73%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.39%	-14.58%	-7.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-0.63%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.14%	-4.22%	-1.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.25%	1.80%	+0.45%

Volatility

ZIN.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO) is 3.38%, while Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that ZIN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZIN.TO	HDIV.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	3.80%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.39%	10.29%	+1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.67%	12.47%	+2.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.70%	15.63%	+1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.04%	15.63%	+2.41%

ZIN.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZIN.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than HDIV.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZIN.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than HDIV.TO's 9.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HDIV.TO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF	9.33%	10.09%	11.38%	10.41%	9.64%	3.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZIN.TO BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF	0.95%	1.22%	1.41%	1.67%	2.01%	1.84%	2.10%	2.31%	1.81%	1.35%	1.91%	2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZIN.TO and HDIV.TO in my portfolio?

ZIN.TO and HDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZIN.TO or HDIV.TO?

On fees, HDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZIN.TO or HDIV.TO?

HDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZIN.TO.

What is the main difference between ZIN.TO and HDIV.TO?

ZIN.TO is categorized as Industrials Equities, while HDIV.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Hamilton ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZIN.TO and 0.00% for HDIV.TO.