ZIG vs. SPMO
ZIG (Acquirers Fund) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Acquirer's Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZIG returned 9.39%/yr vs 24.29%/yr for SPMO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZIG charges 1.85%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
ZIG vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIG achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.
ZIG
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 5.36%
- 1Y
- 16.94%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
ZIG vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIG Acquirers Fund | 8.67% | -2.67% | 11.34% | 36.70% | -17.34% | 37.38% | -15.76% | 9.07% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 8.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIG and SPMO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2019 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ZIG and SPMO has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ZIG vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZIG
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZIG
SPMO
Energy
ZIG
SPMO
Basic Materials
ZIG
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
ZIG
SPMO
Industrials
ZIG
SPMO
Financial Services
ZIG
SPMO
Healthcare
ZIG
SPMO
Technology
ZIG
SPMO
Communication Services
ZIG
-
SPMO
Real Estate
ZIG
-
SPMO
Utilities
ZIG
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIG vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
ZIG
SPMO
ZIG vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acquirers Fund (ZIG) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZIG | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.47 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 3.64 | -2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 14.17 | -10.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIG | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 2.62 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 1.27 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 1.01 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
ZIG vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIG drawdown since its inception was -37.14%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIG and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIG | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.14% | -30.95% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -12.70% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.75% | -20.13% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.75% | -22.74% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | 0.00% | -5.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -4.60% | -5.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 3.26% | +0.86% |
Volatility
ZIG vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Acquirers Fund (ZIG) is 2.97%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that ZIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIG | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 7.35% | -4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 14.39% | -4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.95% | 17.64% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 19.30% | +1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 20.31% | +1.83% |
ZIG vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIG has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIG vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
ZIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
ZIG Acquirers Fund | 1.76% | 1.91% | 1.96% | 1.07% | 1.26% | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIG and SPMO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to ZIG (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIG dropped -37.14% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 24.29% vs 9.39% for ZIG. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, ZIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 24.29% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 1.85% for ZIG.
ZIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.65% for SPMO.
ZIG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. ZIG tracks Acquirer's Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Acquirers Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.85% for ZIG and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZIG and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer