ZIG vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZIG (Acquirers Fund) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Acquirer's Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. ZIG is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, ZIG returned 16.94% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZIG charges 1.85%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

ZIG vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acquirers Fund (ZIG) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIG achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.63% return.

ZIG

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 8.67%
• 6M: 5.36%
• 1Y: 16.94%
• 3Y*: 14.07%
• 5Y*: 9.39%
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZIG vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ZIG Acquirers Fund	8.67%	-2.67%	-0.65%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ZIG and CSHP is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024	0.09

The correlation between ZIG and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZIG vs. CSHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZIG	CSHP
Consumer Cyclical	38.5%	-
Energy	15.3%	-
Basic Materials	13.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	10.1%	-
Industrials	7.0%	-
Financial Services	6.9%	0.1%
Healthcare	4.3%	-
Technology	4.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ZIG vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIG

ZIG Risk / Return Rank: 28
ZIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
ZIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
ZIG Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ZIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
ZIG Martin Ratio Rank: 29

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZIG vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acquirers Fund (ZIG) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZIG	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	11.91	-10.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	31.26	-29.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	7.44	-6.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	65.71	-64.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.12	432.16	-428.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZIG vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIG and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZIG	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	11.91	-10.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	10.75	-10.41

Drawdowns

ZIG vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIG drawdown since its inception was -37.14%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIG and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZIG	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.14%	-0.08%	-37.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.38%	-0.06%	-12.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.64%	0.00%	-5.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.74%	-0.00%	-9.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.12%	0.01%	+4.11%

Volatility

ZIG vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Acquirers Fund (ZIG) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that ZIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZIG	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	0.07%	+2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.23%	0.24%	+9.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.95%	0.33%	+17.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.48%	0.40%	+20.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.14%	0.40%	+21.74%

ZIG vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZIG has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZIG vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

ZIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than CSHP's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZIG Acquirers Fund	1.76%	1.91%	1.96%	1.07%	1.26%	0.18%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZIG and CSHP in my portfolio?

ZIG and CSHP have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZIG or CSHP?

ZIG has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIG dropped -37.14% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, ZIG or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, ZIG leads with 16.94% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZIG or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, ZIG has performed better with a 16.94% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZIG or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.85% for ZIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZIG or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 1.76% for ZIG.

What is the main difference between ZIG and CSHP?

ZIG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Acquirers Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.85% for ZIG and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.