PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZHY.TO vs. ZLC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZHY.TO vs. ZLC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHY.TO) and BMO Long Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZLC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZHY.TO achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than ZLC.TO's 2.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ZHY.TO has outperformed ZLC.TO with an annualized return of 3.77%, while ZLC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.62% annualized return.


ZHY.TO

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.74%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
2.53%
10Y*
3.77%

ZLC.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
2.65%
YTD
2.51%
6M
2.11%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
5.53%
5Y*
0.95%
10Y*
2.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZHY.TO vs. ZLC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZHY.TO
BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF
0.71%6.27%6.04%11.48%-12.80%4.03%3.31%13.45%-3.88%5.06%
ZLC.TO
BMO Long Corporate Bond Index ETF
2.51%2.38%4.69%11.50%-18.31%-3.20%9.51%14.51%-1.66%8.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ZHY.TO and ZLC.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2010

0.05

Over the past year, ZHY.TO and ZLC.TO have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZHY.TO vs. ZLC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZHY.TO
ZHY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ZHY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZHY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZHY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ZHY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZHY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

ZLC.TO
ZLC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ZLC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZHY.TO vs. ZLC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHY.TO) and BMO Long Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZLC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZHY.TOZLC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.10

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

0.87

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.01

2.02

+3.99

ZHY.TO vs. ZLC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZHY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the ZLC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZHY.TO and ZLC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZHY.TOZLC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.56

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.09

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.24

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.47

-0.02

Drawdowns

ZHY.TO vs. ZLC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZHY.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.44%, roughly equal to the maximum ZLC.TO drawdown of -28.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZHY.TO and ZLC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZHY.TOZLC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.44%

-28.61%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-4.64%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.70%

-9.67%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

-24.86%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.44%

-28.61%

+0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-4.27%

+3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-5.99%

+3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

1.99%

-1.20%

Volatility

ZHY.TO vs. ZLC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHY.TO) is 1.96%, while BMO Long Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZLC.TO) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that ZHY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZLC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZHY.TOZLC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

2.35%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.11%

5.55%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.50%

7.22%

-1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.51%

11.04%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.92%

10.87%

+0.05%

ZHY.TO vs. ZLC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZHY.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than ZLC.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZHY.TO vs. ZLC.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZHY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, more than ZLC.TO's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZHY.TO
BMO High Yield US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF
6.38%6.10%6.13%6.43%6.71%5.49%6.09%6.50%6.25%6.10%5.84%7.12%
ZLC.TO
BMO Long Corporate Bond Index ETF
4.56%4.75%4.70%5.01%5.30%4.12%3.82%4.02%4.26%4.01%4.33%4.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZHY.TO and ZLC.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZLC.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZLC.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZHY.TO.

ZHY.TO is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ZLC.TO is Long-Term Bond. ZHY.TO tracks Bloomberg U.S. High Yield Very Liquid Index CAD Hedged, while ZLC.TO tracks FTSE Canada Long Term Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZHY.TO and 0.33% for ZLC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZHY.TO and ZLC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer