ZLC.TO vs. VLB.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Long Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZLC.TO) and Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF (VLB.TO).

ZLC.TO and VLB.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZLC.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the FTSE Canada Long Term Corporate Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 19, 2010. VLB.TO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Canadian 10+ Year Float Adjusted Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2017. Both ZLC.TO and VLB.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ZLC.TO vs. VLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Long Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZLC.TO) and Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF (VLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZLC.TO vs. VLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZLC.TO BMO Long Corporate Bond Index ETF	-0.70%	2.38%	4.69%	11.50%	-18.31%	-3.20%	9.51%	14.51%	-1.66%	7.40%
VLB.TO Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF	0.08%	-1.07%	0.69%	9.27%	-21.79%	-4.94%	9.88%	11.93%	-0.45%	6.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZLC.TO achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than VLB.TO's 0.08% return.

ZLC.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.64%
• YTD: -0.70%
• 6M: -1.03%
• 1Y: 0.05%
• 3Y*: 4.44%
• 5Y*: 0.39%
• 10Y*: 2.62%

VLB.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.76%
• YTD: 0.08%
• 6M: -1.69%
• 1Y: -2.86%
• 3Y*: 1.31%
• 5Y*: -1.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZLC.TO vs. VLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZLC.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than VLB.TO's 0.15% expense ratio.

ZLC.TO

BMO Long Corporate Bond Index ETF

VLB.TO

Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF

Return for Risk

ZLC.TO vs. VLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZLC.TO

ZLC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 12
ZLC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
ZLC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
ZLC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 10
ZLC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
ZLC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 14

VLB.TO

VLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5
VLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
VLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
VLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
VLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
VLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZLC.TO vs. VLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Long Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZLC.TO) and Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF (VLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZLC.TO	VLB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.01	-0.40	+0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.06	-0.47	+0.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	0.94	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.12	-0.39	+0.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.27	-0.76	+1.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZLC.TO vs. VLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZLC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is higher than the VLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZLC.TO and VLB.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZLC.TO	VLB.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01	-0.40	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	-0.16	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.06	+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between ZLC.TO and VLB.TO is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ZLC.TO vs. VLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZLC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than VLB.TO's 4.31% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ZLC.TO BMO Long Corporate Bond Index ETF	4.74%	4.75%	4.70%	5.01%	5.30%	4.12%	3.82%	4.02%	4.26%	4.01%	4.33%	4.53%
VLB.TO Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF	4.31%	3.96%	3.78%	3.47%	3.75%	2.95%	2.80%	2.84%	3.43%	2.82%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ZLC.TO vs. VLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZLC.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.61%, smaller than the maximum VLB.TO drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZLC.TO and VLB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZLC.TO	VLB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.61%	-34.41%	+5.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.15%	-7.32%	+2.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.86%	-27.90%	+3.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.27%	-22.48%	+15.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.98%	-13.99%	+8.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.33%	3.75%	-1.42%

Volatility

ZLC.TO vs. VLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Long Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZLC.TO) is 3.19%, while Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF (VLB.TO) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that ZLC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZLC.TO	VLB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.19%	3.51%	-0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.14%	5.59%	-0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.86%	9.13%	-1.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.01%	12.37%	-1.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.85%	11.24%	-0.39%