ZHDG vs. WMTI

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ZHDG (ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF) and WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. ZHDG charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for WMTI.

Performance

ZHDG vs. WMTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZHDG achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than WMTI's 4.90% return.

ZHDG

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 2.23%
• 6M: 2.00%
• 1Y: 13.02%
• 3Y*: 12.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WMTI

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -0.47%
• YTD: 4.90%
• 6M: 5.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZHDG vs. WMTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF	2.23%	-0.25%
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF	4.90%	9.99%

Correlation

The correlation between ZHDG and WMTI is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

ZHDG vs. WMTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZHDG

ZHDG Risk / Return Rank: 37
ZHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
ZHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
ZHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 36
ZHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ZHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 42

WMTI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZHDG vs. WMTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZHDG	WMTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.13	—	—

Drawdowns

ZHDG vs. WMTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZHDG drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, which is greater than WMTI's maximum drawdown of -17.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZHDG and WMTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZHDG	WMTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.27%	-17.24%	-6.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	-11.42%	+8.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.09%	-4.43%	-3.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZHDG	WMTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.93%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.83%	27.47%	-16.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.81%	27.47%	-15.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.81%	27.47%	-15.66%

ZHDG vs. WMTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZHDG has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than WMTI's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZHDG vs. WMTI - Dividend Comparison

ZHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than WMTI's 23.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF	23.19%	3.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF	2.51%	2.57%	2.59%	1.52%	3.58%	1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZHDG and WMTI in my portfolio?

ZHDG and WMTI have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZHDG or WMTI?

On fees, ZHDG is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZHDG or WMTI?

ZHDG is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for WMTI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZHDG or WMTI?

WMTI has the higher dividend yield at 23.19%, compared with 2.51% for ZHDG.

What is the main difference between ZHDG and WMTI?

They also come from different issuers: ZEGA and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ZHDG and 0.99% for WMTI.