ZHDG vs. AIYY
ZHDG (ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF) and AIYY (YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZHDG returned 18.31% vs -57.47% for AIYY. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZHDG charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AIYY.
Performance
ZHDG vs. AIYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZHDG achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly higher than AIYY's -24.26% return.
ZHDG
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 18.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIYY
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- -24.26%
- 6M
- -29.50%
- 1Y
- -57.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZHDG vs. AIYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF | 5.12% | 14.34% | 18.02% | 1.65% |
AIYY YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF | -24.26% | -58.98% | -14.74% | -1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZHDG and AIYY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2023 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZHDG vs. AIYY — Risk / Return Rank
ZHDG
AIYY
ZHDG vs. AIYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) and YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZHDG | AIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.78 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | -0.84 | +2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.97 | -1.21 | +10.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZHDG | AIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | -1.07 | +2.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | -0.83 | +1.34 |
Drawdowns
ZHDG vs. AIYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZHDG drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, smaller than the maximum AIYY drawdown of -79.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZHDG and AIYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZHDG | AIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.27% | -79.48% | +56.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.56% | -68.33% | +59.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -75.26% | +74.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -41.04% | +32.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 47.63% | -45.58% |
Volatility
ZHDG vs. AIYY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) is 2.80%, while YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) has a volatility of 15.67%. This indicates that ZHDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZHDG | AIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | 15.67% | -12.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.06% | 39.16% | -31.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.27% | 53.83% | -43.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 50.52% | -38.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 50.52% | -38.77% |
ZHDG vs. AIYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZHDG has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than AIYY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZHDG vs. AIYY - Dividend Comparison
ZHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than AIYY's 158.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIYY YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF | 158.78% | 168.33% | 98.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF | 2.44% | 2.57% | 2.59% | 1.52% | 3.58% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZHDG and AIYY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIYY has higher volatility (15.67%) compared to ZHDG (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZHDG dropped -23.27% vs AIYY's -79.48%.
On 1-year performance, ZHDG leads with 18.31% vs -57.47% for AIYY. On fees, ZHDG is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, ZHDG has been the lower-risk option at 2.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ZHDG has performed better with a 18.31% return vs -57.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ZHDG is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AIYY.
AIYY has the higher dividend yield at 158.78%, compared with 2.44% for ZHDG.
They also come from different issuers: ZEGA and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for ZHDG and 0.99% for AIYY.
ZHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZHDG and AIYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer