PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZGQ.TO vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZGQ.TO vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF (ZGQ.TO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZGQ.TO is traded in CAD, while SPY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZGQ.TO having a 13.23% return and SPY slightly lower at 12.65%. Over the past 10 years, ZGQ.TO has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 15.07%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.36% annualized return.


ZGQ.TO

1D
-0.05%
1M
6.84%
YTD
13.23%
6M
8.19%
1Y
25.52%
3Y*
20.50%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
15.07%

SPY

1D
0.00%
1M
7.46%
YTD
12.65%
6M
10.82%
1Y
30.02%
3Y*
23.90%
5Y*
17.15%
10Y*
16.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGQ.TO vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZGQ.TO
BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF
13.23%8.04%29.47%29.38%-18.76%21.44%22.41%28.91%-0.12%19.54%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
12.32%12.32%35.62%23.40%-12.34%27.57%16.33%24.77%3.52%13.96%

Correlation

The correlation between ZGQ.TO and SPY is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014

0.70

The correlation between ZGQ.TO and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZGQ.TO vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZGQ.TO
SPY

Technology

38.4%
35.9%

Healthcare

13.4%
8.4%

Communication Services

13.3%
11.3%

Industrials

11.2%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
4.8%

Financial Services

7.5%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
10.3%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.8%

Energy

0.4%
3.6%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.9%

Utilities

0.2%
2.4%

Technology

ZGQ.TO
38.4%
SPY
35.9%

Healthcare

ZGQ.TO
13.4%
SPY
8.4%

Communication Services

ZGQ.TO
13.3%
SPY
11.3%

Industrials

ZGQ.TO
11.2%
SPY
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

ZGQ.TO
9.3%
SPY
4.8%

Financial Services

ZGQ.TO
7.5%
SPY
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ZGQ.TO
4.0%
SPY
10.3%

Basic Materials

ZGQ.TO
2.2%
SPY
1.8%

Energy

ZGQ.TO
0.4%
SPY
3.6%

Real Estate

ZGQ.TO
0.3%
SPY
1.9%

Utilities

ZGQ.TO
0.2%
SPY
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZGQ.TO vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGQ.TO
ZGQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ZGQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZGQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZGQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ZGQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZGQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGQ.TO vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF (ZGQ.TO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZGQ.TOSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.49

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

3.50

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.30

13.31

-2.02

ZGQ.TO vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGQ.TO and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZGQ.TOSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.59

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

1.14

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

1.01

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

1.13

-0.21

Drawdowns

ZGQ.TO vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.68%, roughly equal to the maximum SPY drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGQ.TO and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZGQ.TOSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.68%

-27.34%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-8.62%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.36%

-19.00%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.68%

-22.08%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.68%

-27.34%

+0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

0.00%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-3.21%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

2.26%

+0.01%

Volatility

ZGQ.TO vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF (ZGQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.61%. This indicates that ZGQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZGQ.TOSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

2.61%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.49%

8.79%

+2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

11.66%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

15.15%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.15%

16.19%

-0.04%

ZGQ.TO vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZGQ.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZGQ.TO vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

ZGQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%
ZGQ.TO
BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF
0.49%0.60%0.90%1.33%1.34%0.86%0.99%1.10%1.51%1.09%1.35%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZGQ.TO and SPY have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ZGQ.TO.

ZGQ.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. ZGQ.TO tracks MSCI All Country World High Quality Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ZGQ.TO and 0.09% for SPY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZGQ.TO and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer