ZGLD.TO vs. KILO-B.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units) (ZGLD.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO).
ZGLD.TO and KILO-B.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZGLD.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Gold Bullion. It was launched on Mar 8, 2024. KILO-B.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Oct 15, 2018.
Performance
ZGLD.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZGLD.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZGLD.TO BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units) | 11.93% | 55.82% | 28.23% |
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged | 9.94% | 56.51% | 27.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZGLD.TO achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly higher than KILO-B.TO's 9.94% return.
ZGLD.TO
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -9.24%
- YTD
- 11.93%
- 6M
- 22.61%
- 1Y
- 48.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KILO-B.TO
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- -9.42%
- YTD
- 9.94%
- 6M
- 21.41%
- 1Y
- 44.69%
- 3Y*
- 34.39%
- 5Y*
- 24.48%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZGLD.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZGLD.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than KILO-B.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZGLD.TO vs. KILO-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZGLD.TO
KILO-B.TO
ZGLD.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units) (ZGLD.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZGLD.TO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 1.73 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 2.19 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 2.73 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | 9.62 | -0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZGLD.TO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.73 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.32 | 1.30 | +1.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZGLD.TO and KILO-B.TO is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ZGLD.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZGLD.TO nor KILO-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGLD.TO BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% |
Drawdowns
ZGLD.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZGLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.23%, smaller than the maximum KILO-B.TO drawdown of -22.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGLD.TO and KILO-B.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZGLD.TO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.23% | -22.54% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.23% | -17.41% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.24% | -10.76% | +1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -7.59% | +4.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 4.93% | +0.03% |
Volatility
ZGLD.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units) (ZGLD.TO) is 10.15%, while Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) has a volatility of 11.07%. This indicates that ZGLD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KILO-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZGLD.TO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.15% | 11.07% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.03% | 22.98% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.00% | 26.05% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 16.59% | +4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 17.98% | +2.71% |