ZGLD.TO vs. MNT.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units) (ZGLD.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO).

ZGLD.TO and MNT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZGLD.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Gold Bullion. It was launched on Mar 8, 2024.

Performance

ZGLD.TO vs. MNT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units) (ZGLD.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZGLD.TO vs. MNT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ZGLD.TO BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units)	10.24%	55.82%	28.23%
MNT.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves	6.88%	61.23%	33.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGLD.TO achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than MNT.TO's 6.88% return.

ZGLD.TO

• 1D: 3.69%
• 1M: -9.21%
• YTD: 10.24%
• 6M: 21.20%
• 1Y: 44.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MNT.TO

• 1D: 3.93%
• 1M: -11.28%
• YTD: 6.88%
• 6M: 14.20%
• 1Y: 40.58%
• 3Y*: 35.64%
• 5Y*: 24.73%
• 10Y*: 14.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGLD.TO vs. MNT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZGLD.TO

BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units)

Return for Risk

ZGLD.TO vs. MNT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGLD.TO

ZGLD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
ZGLD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ZGLD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ZGLD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
ZGLD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ZGLD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

MNT.TO

MNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 70
MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
MNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
MNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
MNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
MNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGLD.TO vs. MNT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units) (ZGLD.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZGLD.TO	MNT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.27	+0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	1.75	+0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.25	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	1.62	+1.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.61	5.94	+3.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZGLD.TO vs. MNT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGLD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGLD.TO and MNT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZGLD.TO	MNT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	1.27	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.28	0.47	+1.80

Correlation

The correlation between ZGLD.TO and MNT.TO is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ZGLD.TO vs. MNT.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZGLD.TO nor MNT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ZGLD.TO vs. MNT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.23%, smaller than the maximum MNT.TO drawdown of -34.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGLD.TO and MNT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZGLD.TO	MNT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.23%	-34.79%	+17.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.23%	-25.01%	+7.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.60%	-14.82%	+4.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-15.65%	+13.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.94%	6.81%	-1.87%

Volatility

ZGLD.TO vs. MNT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units) (ZGLD.TO) is 10.81%, while Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) has a volatility of 13.84%. This indicates that ZGLD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZGLD.TO	MNT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.81%	13.84%	-3.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.99%	27.16%	-4.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.02%	32.08%	-6.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.69%	20.12%	+0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.69%	19.50%	+1.19%