ZGLD.TO vs. CNQ.TO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ZGLD.TO (BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units)) is Gold fund tracking the Gold Bullion, while CNQ.TO (Canadian Natural Resources Limited) is a stock. Over the past year, ZGLD.TO returned 24.23% vs 35.66% for CNQ.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ZGLD.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units) (ZGLD.TO) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGLD.TO achieves a -4.14% return, which is significantly lower than CNQ.TO's 22.98% return.

ZGLD.TO

• 1D: -2.92%
• 1M: -9.00%
• YTD: -4.14%
• 6M: -7.44%
• 1Y: 24.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNQ.TO

• 1D: -3.69%
• 1M: -12.56%
• YTD: 22.98%
• 6M: 26.85%
• 1Y: 35.66%
• 3Y*: 23.79%
• 5Y*: 30.28%
• 10Y*: 21.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGLD.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ZGLD.TO BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units)	-4.14%	55.82%	29.42%
CNQ.TO Canadian Natural Resources Limited	22.98%	10.42%	-3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ZGLD.TO and CNQ.TO is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024	0.07

Return for Risk

ZGLD.TO vs. CNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGLD.TO

ZGLD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 26
ZGLD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
ZGLD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
ZGLD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 30
ZGLD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
ZGLD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 24

CNQ.TO

CNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 75
CNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
CNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
CNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGLD.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units) (ZGLD.TO) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZGLD.TO	CNQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	1.24	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.68	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.22	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	1.94	-0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.91	6.38	-3.47

ZGLD.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGLD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the CNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGLD.TO and CNQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZGLD.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.27%, smaller than the maximum CNQ.TO drawdown of -74.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGLD.TO and CNQ.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZGLD.TO	CNQ.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.27%	-74.63%	+52.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.27%	-18.43%	-3.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-33.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.27%	-18.43%	-3.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.76%	-17.65%	+13.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.35%	5.60%	+2.75%

Volatility

ZGLD.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units) (ZGLD.TO) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) have volatilities of 8.87% and 9.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZGLD.TO	CNQ.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.87%	9.20%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.95%	24.46%	-1.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.47%	29.04%	-2.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.08%	30.63%	-9.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.08%	38.14%	-17.06%

Dividends

ZGLD.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZGLD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNQ.TO Canadian Natural Resources Limited	4.33%	5.05%	6.00%	8.53%	12.23%	7.63%	11.35%	7.29%	8.31%	5.00%	4.49%	6.22%
ZGLD.TO BMO Gold Bullion ETF (CAD Units)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZGLD.TO and CNQ.TO in my portfolio?

ZGLD.TO and CNQ.TO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.