ZGI.TO vs. ZIN.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ZGI.TO (BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF) and ZIN.TO (BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds from BMO - ZGI.TO tracks the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure North American Listed Index while ZIN.TO tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZGI.TO returned 8.52%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for ZIN.TO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.61% expense ratio.

Performance

ZGI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ZGI.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGI.TO achieves a 17.33% return, which is significantly lower than ZIN.TO's 24.06% return. Over the past 10 years, ZGI.TO has underperformed ZIN.TO with an annualized return of 8.52%, while ZIN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.

ZGI.TO

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 1.47%
• 6M: 15.40%
• YTD: 17.33%
• 1Y: 17.58%
• 3Y*: 15.07%
• 5Y*: 10.65%
• 10Y*: 8.52%

ZIN.TO

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 1.92%
• 6M: 17.92%
• YTD: 24.06%
• 1Y: 33.13%
• 3Y*: 20.43%
• 5Y*: 13.35%
• 10Y*: 13.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZGI.TO BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF	17.33%	1.01%	25.45%	-0.64%	4.56%	26.89%	-10.43%	25.26%	-0.75%	2.97%
ZIN.TO BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF	24.06%	16.80%	16.33%	19.36%	-8.05%	17.86%	6.62%	22.67%	-6.61%	17.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ZGI.TO and ZIN.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2012	0.24

The correlation between ZGI.TO and ZIN.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZGI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZGI.TO	ZIN.TO
Energy	44.8%	9.4%
Utilities	41.7%	2.8%
Real Estate	11.9%	2.3%
Industrials	1.6%	75.1%
Basic Materials	-	2.3%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	5.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

ZGI.TO vs. ZIN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGI.TO

ZGI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 52
ZGI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
ZGI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ZGI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ZGI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ZGI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 53

ZIN.TO

ZIN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 83
ZIN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ZIN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
ZIN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ZIN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ZIN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ZGI.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZGI.TO	ZIN.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	2.17	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	2.83	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.38	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	4.11	-1.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.31	13.95	-6.65

ZGI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the ZIN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGI.TO and ZIN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZGI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGI.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, smaller than the maximum ZIN.TO drawdown of -44.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGI.TO and ZIN.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZGI.TO	ZIN.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.76%	-44.01%	+9.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.65%	-8.10%	+1.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.07%	-22.39%	+12.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.61%	-23.10%	+6.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.76%	-44.01%	+9.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.65%	-0.29%	-1.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-5.77%	+1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	2.38%	+0.03%

Volatility

ZGI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ZGI.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO) have volatilities of 4.39% and 4.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZGI.TO	ZIN.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	4.41%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.19%	12.35%	-2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.70%	15.37%	-2.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.39%	16.84%	-3.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.98%	18.04%	-2.06%

ZGI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZGI.TO and ZIN.TO have an expense ratio of 0.61%.

Dividends

ZGI.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZGI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than ZIN.TO's 0.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ZGI.TO BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF	2.25%	2.77%	2.82%	3.33%	3.01%	3.06%	3.75%	2.85%	2.99%	2.59%	2.60%	2.97%
ZIN.TO BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF	0.87%	1.22%	1.42%	1.68%	2.01%	1.84%	2.10%	2.32%	1.82%	1.35%	1.48%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZGI.TO and ZIN.TO in my portfolio?

ZGI.TO and ZIN.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZGI.TO or ZIN.TO?

Both ETFs have the same 0.61% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZGI.TO or ZIN.TO?

ZGI.TO and ZIN.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.61% per year.

What is the main difference between ZGI.TO and ZIN.TO?

ZGI.TO tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure North American Listed Index, while ZIN.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index.