CIF.TO vs. FXAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX).
CIF.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Manulife Investment Management Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Aug 27, 2008. FXAIX is managed by Fidelity.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CIF.TO or FXAIX.
Correlation
The correlation between CIF.TO and FXAIX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CIF.TO vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CIF.TO:
3.21
FXAIX:
2.17
CIF.TO:
4.46
FXAIX:
2.89
CIF.TO:
1.59
FXAIX:
1.41
CIF.TO:
6.67
FXAIX:
3.21
CIF.TO:
19.67
FXAIX:
14.15
CIF.TO:
1.78%
FXAIX:
1.92%
CIF.TO:
10.89%
FXAIX:
12.50%
CIF.TO:
-42.37%
FXAIX:
-33.79%
CIF.TO:
-3.92%
FXAIX:
-2.20%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIF.TO achieves a 33.83% return, which is significantly higher than FXAIX's 26.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CIF.TO has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 10.43%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.
CIF.TO
33.83%
-2.20%
16.79%
33.80%
13.76%
10.43%
FXAIX
26.49%
-0.16%
9.99%
26.93%
14.89%
12.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIF.TO vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIF.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CIF.TO vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CIF.TO vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison
CIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than FXAIX's 0.88% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF | 2.85% | 2.63% | 2.83% | 2.49% | 2.30% | 2.05% | 2.73% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.69% | 6.64% | 4.27% |
Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 0.88% | 1.45% | 1.69% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 1.95% | 2.07% | 1.81% | 2.01% | 2.56% | 2.63% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
CIF.TO vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIF.TO and FXAIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CIF.TO vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 3.72%. This indicates that CIF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.