ZGD.TO vs. ^GSPC
ZGD.TO (BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF) is Gold fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Global Gold Index, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, ZGD.TO returned 18.07%/yr vs 14.52%/yr for ^GSPC. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
ZGD.TO vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZGD.TO is traded in CAD, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZGD.TO achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 12.12% return. Over the past 10 years, ZGD.TO has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 18.07%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 14.52% annualized return.
ZGD.TO
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 6M
- 13.53%
- 1Y
- 83.82%
- 3Y*
- 55.62%
- 5Y*
- 30.59%
- 10Y*
- 18.07%
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 6M
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 28.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 15.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
ZGD.TO vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGD.TO BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF | 6.26% | 170.64% | 37.48% | 10.17% | -2.30% | -12.57% | 26.59% | 53.72% | -12.09% | -0.73% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 11.75% | 11.05% | 33.90% | 21.49% | -13.70% | 25.75% | 14.29% | 22.54% | 1.71% | 11.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZGD.TO and ^GSPC is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2012 | -0.02 |
The correlation between ZGD.TO and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZGD.TO vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
ZGD.TO
^GSPC
ZGD.TO vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF (ZGD.TO) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZGD.TO | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.47 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 3.24 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.60 | 12.23 | -4.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZGD.TO | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 2.46 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 1.05 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.89 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.99 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
ZGD.TO vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -60.12%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -27.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGD.TO and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZGD.TO | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.12% | -27.59% | -32.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.15% | -8.86% | -21.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.15% | -19.23% | -10.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.75% | -22.60% | -20.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.72% | -27.59% | -24.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.75% | 0.00% | -22.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.33% | -3.51% | -24.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.06% | 2.34% | +8.72% |
Volatility
ZGD.TO vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
BMO Equal Weight Global Gold Index ETF (ZGD.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.70% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.69%. This indicates that ZGD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZGD.TO | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.70% | 2.69% | +13.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.43% | 8.85% | +27.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.11% | 11.70% | +33.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 14.99% | +21.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.35% | 16.33% | +21.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZGD.TO and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ZGD.TO and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer