PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZFEB vs. POCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZFEB vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZFEB vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZFEB achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's -1.84% return.


ZFEB

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
0.04%
6M
1.72%
1Y
7.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POCT

1D
1.72%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
-1.84%
6M
0.02%
1Y
10.97%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZFEB vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZFEB and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

ZFEB vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZFEB
ZFEB Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZFEB vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZFEBPOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.56

1.06

+1.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.77

1.61

+2.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.26

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.38

1.58

+2.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.01

8.51

+11.51

ZFEB vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZFEB and POCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZFEBPOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

1.06

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

0.79

+0.98

Correlation

The correlation between ZFEB and POCT is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ZFEB vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZFEB nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ZFEB
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%

Drawdowns

ZFEB vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZFEB drawdown since its inception was -3.00%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZFEB and POCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZFEBPOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-18.80%

+15.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.73%

-7.20%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-2.75%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-1.53%

+1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

1.33%

-0.95%

Volatility

ZFEB vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) is 0.95%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that ZFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZFEBPOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

3.28%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.67%

5.13%

-3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87%

10.35%

-7.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.02%

7.90%

-4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.02%

10.31%

-7.29%