ZFEB vs. BAMU

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ZFEB (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZFEB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZFEB returned 6.81% vs 2.83% for BAMU. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ZFEB charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

ZFEB vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZFEB achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.52% return.

ZFEB

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.60%
• 6M: 2.27%
• YTD: 3.03%
• 1Y: 6.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.20%

BAMU

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.24%
• 6M: 1.24%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 1Y: 2.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	$205.15K	$225.66K	$217.36K
ZFEB Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February	$77.83K	$235.95K	$414.31K

ZFEB vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZFEB Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February	3.03%	6.19%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.52%	2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ZFEB and BAMU is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

ZFEB vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZFEB

ZFEB Risk / Return Rank: 96
ZFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ZFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ZFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ZFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ZFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 99
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZFEB vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZFEB	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.20	4.89	-1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.10	8.61	-3.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	2.40	-0.71
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.07	24.03	-18.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.33	95.51	-71.17

ZFEB vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZFEB Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZFEB and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZFEB vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZFEB drawdown since its inception was -3.00%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZFEB and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZFEB	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.00%	-0.36%	-2.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.35%	-0.12%	-1.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.34%	-0.02%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	0.03%	+0.25%

Volatility

ZFEB vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) has a higher volatility of 0.55% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.10%. This indicates that ZFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZFEB	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.55%	0.10%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.55%	0.36%	+1.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14%	0.58%	+1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.79%	0.85%	+1.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.79%	0.85%	+1.94%

ZFEB vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZFEB vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

ZFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.04%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
ZFEB Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZFEB and BAMU in my portfolio?

ZFEB and BAMU have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZFEB or BAMU?

ZFEB has higher volatility (0.55%) compared to BAMU (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZFEB dropped -3.00% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, ZFEB or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, ZFEB leads with 6.81% vs 2.83% for BAMU. On fees, ZFEB is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZFEB or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, ZFEB has performed better with a 6.81% return vs 2.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZFEB or BAMU?

ZFEB is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZFEB or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 0.00% for ZFEB.

What is the main difference between ZFEB and BAMU?

ZFEB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZFEB and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.89 vs 3.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.