ZFEB vs. APRB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZFEB (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February) and APRB (Aptus April Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZFEB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for APRB.

Performance

ZFEB vs. APRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZFEB achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than APRB's 4.77% return.

ZFEB

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 2.36%
• 6M: 3.03%
• 1Y: 7.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRB

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 4.77%
• 6M: 5.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZFEB vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZFEB Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February	2.36%	1.75%
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF	4.77%	2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ZFEB and APRB is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.82

Return for Risk

ZFEB vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZFEB

ZFEB Risk / Return Rank: 94
ZFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ZFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ZFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ZFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ZFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZFEB vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZFEB	APRB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.55	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.79	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.81	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.36	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZFEB	APRB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.24	2.00	+0.23

Drawdowns

ZFEB vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZFEB drawdown since its inception was -3.00%, smaller than the maximum APRB drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZFEB and APRB.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZFEB	APRB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.00%	-4.59%	+1.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.11%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.36%	-0.74%	+0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZFEB	APRB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.38%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.45%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21%	5.98%	-3.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.88%	5.98%	-3.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.88%	5.98%	-3.10%

ZFEB vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZFEB vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZFEB nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZFEB and APRB in my portfolio?

ZFEB and APRB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZFEB or APRB?

On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZFEB or APRB?

APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZFEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZFEB or APRB?

ZFEB and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ZFEB and APRB?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZFEB and 0.25% for APRB.