ZEQT.TO vs. ZDIV.TO
ZEQT.TO (BMO All-Equity ETF) and ZDIV.TO (BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while ZDIV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Select Index. ZEQT.TO is actively managed, while ZDIV.TO is passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZEQT.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ZDIV.TO.
Performance
ZEQT.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZEQT.TO
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 13.34%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 30.84%
- 3Y*
- 26.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZDIV.TO
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZEQT.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZEQT.TO BMO All-Equity ETF | 11.86% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 13.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZEQT.TO and ZDIV.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZEQT.TO vs. ZDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZEQT.TO
ZDIV.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ZEQT.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO) and BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF (ZDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZEQT.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.64 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZEQT.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.18%, which is greater than ZDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEQT.TO and ZDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZEQT.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.18% | -2.60% | -12.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -2.03% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -0.52% | -2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | — | — |
Volatility
ZEQT.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZEQT.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.37% | 9.92% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 9.92% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 9.92% | +3.59% |
ZEQT.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZEQT.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDIV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZEQT.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than ZDIV.TO's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZEQT.TO BMO All-Equity ETF | 1.92% | 2.89% | 5.08% | 6.40% | 7.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZEQT.TO and ZDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ZEQT.TO.
ZEQT.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while ZDIV.TO is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ZEQT.TO and 0.09% for ZDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZEQT.TO and ZDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer